Viewing Study NCT06514365



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06514365
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: None
First Post: 2020-07-22

Brief Title: Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Subsartorial Saphenous Block and Popliteal Sciatic vs Subsartorial Saphenous Block and IPACK in Total Knee Replacement Surgery
Sponsor: None
Organization: None

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Subsartorial Saphenous Block and Popliteal Sciatic vs Subsartorial Saphenous Block and IPACK in Total Knee Replacement Surgery A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Total knee replacement surgery is associated with significant pain in the immediate postoperative period especially in movement In turn this is associated with more subsequent chronic pain

There are multiple options and the tendency is to perform increasingly distal nerve blocks to minimize limb weakness and thus allow early rehabilitation In 2012 in an oral communication Sanjay Sinha described a new nerve block called iPACK Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee There are few studies on the efficacy of such a blockade so far but none comparing the groups saphene sciatic blocks vs saphene iPACK blocks

Therefore this study aims to provide more information on the effectiveness this nerve blocks in total knee replacement in terms of analgesia and motor function
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None