Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06502886
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-06-30
Brief Title:
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction in Adult Patients Using Bonded Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer Combined With Vacuum Formed Retainer A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to compare between the stability of anterior and posterior segments in both arches using bonded lingual retainers versus a combined protocol of retention bonded lingual retainer and vacuum formed retainers The effect of different treatment changes achieved on the post-treatment stability will be studied in both groups
Hypothesis No difference between BR and BRVFR regarding the stability of anterior segment alignment and posterior segment alignment and interdigitation
Hypothesis No difference between BR and BRVFR regarding the stability of anterior segment alignment and posterior segment alignment and interdigitation
Detailed Description:
Retention is necessary to be done after orthodontic treatment It aids to prevent the tendency for relapse of teeth toward their pretreatment position Fixed or removable retention appliances can reduce the risk of relapse but to date there is still limited evidence on treatment protocols wearing time and duration However long-term retention with bonded lingual retainers is commonly recommended and often considered the gold standard method of first choice in orthodontic retention Regardless of the expected benefits concerning tooth stabilization aesthetic appearance and independency from the patients compliance there have been increasing numbers of reports on undesirable changes in tooth position in the presence of retainers Since active lingual retainers are able to exert forces to teeth they have been suspected of causing torque changes of adjacent incisors X-effect Therefore several authors recommend to insert removable and fixed in both arches for maximum relapse prevention
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None