Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-25 @ 8:03 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06646068
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-10-11
Brief Title:
Enhancing Clinical Judgment Competence in Nursing Education A Mixed-Methods Study in the Philippines
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Refining Clinical Judgment Competence in Nursing Education The Impact of the Philips 66 Brainstorming Technique in Case-Based Learning
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
MMS
Brief Summary:
The goal of this mixed-methods study is to assess the impact of the Philips 66 brainstorming technique integrated with case-based learning CBL on refining clinical judgment competence in senior nursing students in the Philippines
The main question it aims to answer is
Does the Philips 66 technique improve clinical judgment competence among nursing students more effectively than traditional CBL methods
Participants will be senior nursing students randomly assigned to an intervention group using the Philips 66-CBL and a control group using standard CBL Clinical judgment competence will be evaluated through pre- and post-test assessments using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric LCJR and confidence questionnaires A subset of participants from the intervention group will take part in focus group discussions to explore their experiences with the Philips 66 technique Data will be collected over a short-term period for quantitative and qualitative analysis
The main question it aims to answer is
Does the Philips 66 technique improve clinical judgment competence among nursing students more effectively than traditional CBL methods
Participants will be senior nursing students randomly assigned to an intervention group using the Philips 66-CBL and a control group using standard CBL Clinical judgment competence will be evaluated through pre- and post-test assessments using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric LCJR and confidence questionnaires A subset of participants from the intervention group will take part in focus group discussions to explore their experiences with the Philips 66 technique Data will be collected over a short-term period for quantitative and qualitative analysis
Detailed Description:
This study utilizes an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to evaluate the effectiveness of the Philips 66 brainstorming technique integrated with case-based learning CBL in enhancing clinical judgment competence among senior nursing students in the Philippines The study consists of two phases a quantitative experimental phase and a qualitative exploratory phase
The quantitative phase adopts a true experimental pre-testpost-test design involving 60 senior nursing students who will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group n30 or the control group n30 The intervention group will undergo CBL sessions facilitated by the Philips 66 technique while the control group will follow the standard CBL approach The Philips 66 technique is a structured form of small group brainstorming where participants collaborate in smaller teams fostering idea generation and peer learning in a timed setting Clinical judgment competence will be assessed before and after the intervention using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric LCJR which measures four dimensions of clinical judgment noticing interpreting responding and reflecting Additionally a researcher-designed questionnaire will be used to measure students confidence levels in their clinical decision-making abilities
The qualitative phase will involve focus group discussions FGDs with a subset of participants from the intervention group to gain deeper insights into their experiences with the Philips 66 technique These discussions will aim to explore how the technique influences their critical thinking decision-making and collaborative learning processes Thematic analysis will be applied to identify recurring themes and key experiences
Statistical analysis for the quantitative component will include descriptive statistics non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to analyze differences in clinical judgment competence and confidence levels between the two groups For the qualitative component data from FGDs will be analyzed thematically to provide contextual understanding and support for the quantitative findings
The study aims to determine whether the integration of the Philips 66 technique with CBL can significantly enhance the development of clinical judgment competence in nursing students preparing them for the challenges of real-world clinical settings Future studies may be conducted across different contexts to validate the long-term effects of this intervention
The quantitative phase adopts a true experimental pre-testpost-test design involving 60 senior nursing students who will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group n30 or the control group n30 The intervention group will undergo CBL sessions facilitated by the Philips 66 technique while the control group will follow the standard CBL approach The Philips 66 technique is a structured form of small group brainstorming where participants collaborate in smaller teams fostering idea generation and peer learning in a timed setting Clinical judgment competence will be assessed before and after the intervention using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric LCJR which measures four dimensions of clinical judgment noticing interpreting responding and reflecting Additionally a researcher-designed questionnaire will be used to measure students confidence levels in their clinical decision-making abilities
The qualitative phase will involve focus group discussions FGDs with a subset of participants from the intervention group to gain deeper insights into their experiences with the Philips 66 technique These discussions will aim to explore how the technique influences their critical thinking decision-making and collaborative learning processes Thematic analysis will be applied to identify recurring themes and key experiences
Statistical analysis for the quantitative component will include descriptive statistics non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to analyze differences in clinical judgment competence and confidence levels between the two groups For the qualitative component data from FGDs will be analyzed thematically to provide contextual understanding and support for the quantitative findings
The study aims to determine whether the integration of the Philips 66 technique with CBL can significantly enhance the development of clinical judgment competence in nursing students preparing them for the challenges of real-world clinical settings Future studies may be conducted across different contexts to validate the long-term effects of this intervention
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None