Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-25 @ 8:03 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06507618
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-06-20
Brief Title:
Pre-Operative Window of ET to Inform RT Decisions POWER II
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions in Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer POWER II
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
POWER II
Brief Summary:
This is a Phase III multisite exploratory study for women 65 years of age with early stage estrogen receptor positive ER breast cancer These individuals will be treated randomly assigned to one of two groups
Intervention treated with 3 months of pre-operative endocrine therapy pre-ET OR Control participants follow standard of care and proceed directly to breast cancer surgery
Both arms will be assessed for tolerance and compliance to the endocrine therapy by patient reported outcome PRO measures patient surveys
Intervention treated with 3 months of pre-operative endocrine therapy pre-ET OR Control participants follow standard of care and proceed directly to breast cancer surgery
Both arms will be assessed for tolerance and compliance to the endocrine therapy by patient reported outcome PRO measures patient surveys
Detailed Description:
Early-stage estrogen receptor positive ER breast cancer is traditionally treated with breast conserving surgery BCS radiation therapy RT and 5-10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy AET Radiation therapy RT omission is an established treatment paradigm for women 65 years and older with ER node negative small 3 cm breast cancer Despite the option for RT omission being recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN guidelines multiple modern studies demonstrate that a majority of older women still receive RT raising concern for over-treatment Conversely there are a portion of patients who choose to omit RT but are not able to tolerate AET and thus are at risk for under-treatment and worse oncologic outcomes
In the POWER I trial patients were treated with 90 days of pre-operative endocrine therapy pre-ET as a window to establish endocrine therapy ET tolerance The POWER I trial prospectively validated 90 days of pre-operative ET to determine if it could be used as a tool to inform adjuvant RT decisions and recommendations by patients and physicians respectively Ninety days of pre-ET was shown to influence patient and physician preferences regarding adjuvant RT
In the POWER II trial participants will be randomized to treatment on either a an intervention arm consisting of a 90-day window of pre-ET or b the standard of care control arm in which participants proceed directly to BCS In both arms the decision to omit or administer adjuvant RT will be made by the treating physicians and patients While not required per protocol all patients will be recommended for AET if deemed appropriate by their oncologist and adherence through 2 years will be monitored The POWER I study revealed that pre-ET impacts patients and physicians decisions regarding adjuvant therapy and facilitates adjuvant therapy decisions that meld patient preferences and side effect tolerance The purpose of the POWER II study is to examine whether 90 days of pre-ET results in a decrease in the number of 1 patients being treated with BCS alone and 2 patients treated with BCSRTAET Adherence to AET will be defined as taking AET at 2 years post-BCS
In the POWER I trial patients were treated with 90 days of pre-operative endocrine therapy pre-ET as a window to establish endocrine therapy ET tolerance The POWER I trial prospectively validated 90 days of pre-operative ET to determine if it could be used as a tool to inform adjuvant RT decisions and recommendations by patients and physicians respectively Ninety days of pre-ET was shown to influence patient and physician preferences regarding adjuvant RT
In the POWER II trial participants will be randomized to treatment on either a an intervention arm consisting of a 90-day window of pre-ET or b the standard of care control arm in which participants proceed directly to BCS In both arms the decision to omit or administer adjuvant RT will be made by the treating physicians and patients While not required per protocol all patients will be recommended for AET if deemed appropriate by their oncologist and adherence through 2 years will be monitored The POWER I study revealed that pre-ET impacts patients and physicians decisions regarding adjuvant therapy and facilitates adjuvant therapy decisions that meld patient preferences and side effect tolerance The purpose of the POWER II study is to examine whether 90 days of pre-ET results in a decrease in the number of 1 patients being treated with BCS alone and 2 patients treated with BCSRTAET Adherence to AET will be defined as taking AET at 2 years post-BCS
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None