Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:01 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 11:30 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01374061
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted:
2014-05-08
First Post:
2011-05-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy
Sponsor:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy : a Comparative Study of Macintosh and GLIDESCOPE Ranger®
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date:
2014-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Sponsor decision
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
EVE
Brief Summary:
The objective of this work is to compare standard intubation with video laryngoscope (Glide scope Ranger ) in French pre hospital multicentric study.
Detailed Description:
Introduction: In France, patients in critical status brought to hospital by emergency physicians and nurses experimented in tracheal intubation. It is an invasive act allowing a protection of airways and an optimal oxygenation of the patients in distress. The reference technique is the direct laryngoscopy by Macintosh . Corresponding data shows that a video laryngoscope - GLIDESCOPE laryngoscope - improve the conditions of intubation in the surgical unit thanks to a better display(visualization) of the opening. A derived device for pre hospital emergency units (GLIDESCOPE Ranger®) deserves to be compared with the classic laryngoscopy in emergency conditions.
Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method
Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.
Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method
Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-A01512-37 | OTHER | IDRCB | View |