Viewing Study NCT06592690



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-10-25 @ 7:55 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:40 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06592690
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: None
First Post: 2024-09-06

Brief Title: Effect of Rate-responsive Compared to VDD Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients
Sponsor: None
Organization: None

Study Overview

Official Title: Effect of Rate-responsive Compared to VDD Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study aims to understand the best programming pacing mode for cardiac resynchronization therapy devices used to treat chronic heart failure
Detailed Description: Cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT efficacy trials to date used atrial-synchronous biventricular pacing wherein there is no or minimal atrial pacing However bradycardia and chronotropic incompetence are common in this patient population

Despite neutral results on hard clinical outcomes of the atrial support in CRT patients it is not clear if a rate-responsive pacing may add incremental benefits on exercise capability

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of RR pacing compare to VVD pacing in patients implanted with CRT devices in term of functional capacity measured by the six-minute walking test 6MWT This simple test has shown to be an independent predictors of mortality in this cohort of patients

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None