Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-25 @ 7:54 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06556498
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-06-29
Brief Title:
Progrip Versus ProFlor Two Fixation Free Devices for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Progrip Versus ProFlor Two Fixation Free Devices for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair A Randomized Clinical Trial The ProPro Study
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
ProPro
Brief Summary:
there are currently two methods for fixation free laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair specifically based on the intrinsic properties of the device used The Progrip mesh technique leaves the hernia orifice patent and relies on the established principle of strengthening the groin through scar tissue incorporation induced by foreign body reaction In contrast the ProFlor concept introduces a 3D dynamic regenerative scaffold that permanently obliterates the defect and regenerates the herniated inguinal barrier This report presents the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques employing Progrip and ProFlor in randomized clinical trial The results of this clinical study may have the potential to pave the way for innovative advancements in hernia repair techniques
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None