Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-25 @ 7:53 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:40 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06599567
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-09-12
Brief Title:
Motor Imagery and Wii-Based Biofeedback for Rotator Cuff Injuries
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Effect of Graded Motor Imagery and Nintendo Wii- Based Biofeedback Techniques on Rotator Cuff Pathologies
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Purpose This study aims to compare the effectiveness of conventional therapy Graded Motor Imagery GMI and Nintendo Wii-based biofeedback therapy in patients with rotator cuff injuries The goal is to evaluate the impact of these three methods on pain management range of motion ROM patient satisfaction and functional performance
Hypotheses
There is no significant difference in pain management between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
There is no significant difference in shoulder ROM between the three therapies There is no significant difference in patient satisfaction among the therapies There is no significant difference in functional performance improvement between the therapies
Methods A randomized double-blind controlled trial will be conducted with 30 patients with rotator cuff injuries They will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and undergo 6 weeks of treatment Pain ROM and functional performance will be assessed pre- and post-treatment Data will be analyzed using ANOVA
Potential OutcomesSignificance The study may show that innovative approaches like GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy are effective treatment options Results could contribute to developing new strategies for treating chronic pain and motor dysfunctions
Hypotheses
There is no significant difference in pain management between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
There is no significant difference in shoulder ROM between the three therapies There is no significant difference in patient satisfaction among the therapies There is no significant difference in functional performance improvement between the therapies
Methods A randomized double-blind controlled trial will be conducted with 30 patients with rotator cuff injuries They will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and undergo 6 weeks of treatment Pain ROM and functional performance will be assessed pre- and post-treatment Data will be analyzed using ANOVA
Potential OutcomesSignificance The study may show that innovative approaches like GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy are effective treatment options Results could contribute to developing new strategies for treating chronic pain and motor dysfunctions
Detailed Description:
Study Title Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional Therapy Graded Motor Imagery GMI and Nintendo Wii-Based Biofeedback Therapy in Rotator Cuff Injuries
Purpose The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three different therapeutic interventions-conventional therapy Graded Motor Imagery GMI and Nintendo Wii-based biofeedback therapy-in managing rotator cuff injuries The study will evaluate the impact of these therapies on key outcomes including pain management shoulder range of motion ROM patient satisfaction and functional performance By comparing these methods the study seeks to determine which therapy offers the best overall benefit for patients with rotator cuff injuries
Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1 There is no significant difference in pain management between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in pain management exist among these therapies
Hypothesis 2 There is no significant difference in shoulder ROM between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in shoulder ROM exist among these therapies
Hypothesis 3 There is no significant difference in patient satisfaction among conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in patient satisfaction exist among these therapies
Hypothesis 4 There is no significant difference in functional performance improvement between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in functional performance improvement exist among these therapies
Methods This study will use a randomized double-blind controlled trial design A total of 30 patients diagnosed with rotator cuff injuries will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups conventional therapy Graded Motor Imagery GMI or Nintendo Wii-based biofeedback therapy Each group will undergo their respective treatment for a duration of 6 weeks The effectiveness of each treatment will be assessed through measurements taken before and after the intervention Pain levels shoulder ROM and functional performance will be evaluated using standardized assessment tools Statistical analysis will be performed using ANOVA to compare outcomes across the three treatment groups
Potential OutcomesSignificance The results of this study have the potential to highlight the effectiveness of innovative therapies like GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries If these methods are found to be more effective than conventional therapy they could represent valuable additions to treatment options for patients suffering from chronic pain and motor dysfunctions The findings may contribute to the development of new evidence-based strategies for managing rotator cuff injuries and improving patient outcomes in rehabilitation settings
Purpose The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three different therapeutic interventions-conventional therapy Graded Motor Imagery GMI and Nintendo Wii-based biofeedback therapy-in managing rotator cuff injuries The study will evaluate the impact of these therapies on key outcomes including pain management shoulder range of motion ROM patient satisfaction and functional performance By comparing these methods the study seeks to determine which therapy offers the best overall benefit for patients with rotator cuff injuries
Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1 There is no significant difference in pain management between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in pain management exist among these therapies
Hypothesis 2 There is no significant difference in shoulder ROM between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in shoulder ROM exist among these therapies
Hypothesis 3 There is no significant difference in patient satisfaction among conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in patient satisfaction exist among these therapies
Hypothesis 4 There is no significant difference in functional performance improvement between conventional therapy GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy
Alternative Hypothesis H1 Significant differences in functional performance improvement exist among these therapies
Methods This study will use a randomized double-blind controlled trial design A total of 30 patients diagnosed with rotator cuff injuries will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups conventional therapy Graded Motor Imagery GMI or Nintendo Wii-based biofeedback therapy Each group will undergo their respective treatment for a duration of 6 weeks The effectiveness of each treatment will be assessed through measurements taken before and after the intervention Pain levels shoulder ROM and functional performance will be evaluated using standardized assessment tools Statistical analysis will be performed using ANOVA to compare outcomes across the three treatment groups
Potential OutcomesSignificance The results of this study have the potential to highlight the effectiveness of innovative therapies like GMI and Wii-based biofeedback therapy in the treatment of rotator cuff injuries If these methods are found to be more effective than conventional therapy they could represent valuable additions to treatment options for patients suffering from chronic pain and motor dysfunctions The findings may contribute to the development of new evidence-based strategies for managing rotator cuff injuries and improving patient outcomes in rehabilitation settings
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None