Viewing Study NCT06496906



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-07-17 @ 11:59 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:34 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06496906
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-07-11
First Post: 2024-06-26

Brief Title: Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction Systems
Sponsor: Plovdiv Medical University
Organization: Plovdiv Medical University

Study Overview

Official Title: Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction Systems
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the vertical extraction system Benex and Physics forceps with the conventional extraction tools extraction forceps and elevators in the early wound healing period after tooth extraction as means for minimally invasive tooth extraction

All patients aged 18 years and over who require closed tooth extraction with good oral hygiene were eligible for participation

Participants were randomly allocated to tooth extraction with either Benex Physics forceps or conventional extraction tools using box randomization Patients are followed up during the recovery period to assess pain and early wound healing while at the time of extraction success and buccal cortical plate fracture were evaluated
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None