Ignite Creation Date:
2024-07-17 @ 11:42 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:32 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06464354
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-18
First Post:
2024-06-12
Brief Title:
Comparison of the Mammary Harvesting Technique
Sponsor:
University Hospital Ostrava
Organization:
University Hospital Ostrava
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Effect of Mammary Artery Harvesting Technique to Sternal Blood Supply Using Non-contact Dynamic Thermography
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The skeletonization technique of left internal artery LIMA harvesting is reported as more spar-ing to the vascular supply of the sternum Some studies report a greater length and greater flow of the graft additionally The aim of our study was to measure the difference in post-op sternal blood supply compared to the pedicle harvesting technique and to measure the length and flow of the LIMA graft
Detailed Description:
A total of 90 patients were examined in a prospective randomized study In 60 patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting CABG LIMA was harvested one-half n30 skeletonized and one-half n30 with a pedicle Thirty patients operated via sternotomy without LIMA harvesting other procedures for instance valve surgery were the control group In patients undergoing LIMA harvest harvest duration graft length and graft free flow were measured at defined arterial pressure In all patients the sternal blood flow was examined by active dynamic thermography DIRT first preoperatively and on 4th postoperative day During this the time of spontaneous rewarming of the skin surface after the application of a cold stimulus was measured in the caudal part of the sternum The difference between postoperative and preoperative time was calculated and compared between groups
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None
Secondary IDs
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGS25LF2023 | OTHER_GRANT | None | None |