Ignite Creation Date:
2024-07-17 @ 11:11 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:32 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06467721
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-21
First Post:
2024-06-10
Brief Title:
Clinical Efficacy of Self-adhesive Silicone Gel Waterproof Dressings Versus Conventional Dressings in the Healing of Incisions After Total Joint Arthroplasty
Sponsor:
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
Organization:
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Clinical Efficacy of Self-adhesive Silicone Gel Waterproof Dressings Versus Conventional Dressings in the Healing of Incisions After Total Joint Arthroplasty a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Study
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
Yes
Brief Summary:
The efficacy of using self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressings versus conventional gauze dressings for recovery after total joint arthroplasty TJA remains unclear In our study we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare these two types of dressings Patients were divided into two groups following TJA and we collected primary outcome measures such as skin infection rate and re-operation rate Additionally we gathered blood inflammatory indicators including C-reactive protein CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate ESR to evaluate the effectiveness of the two treatments Finally we perform one year follow up including REEDA score MSS score to evaluate the recovery of the skin
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None