Ignite Creation Date:
2024-06-16 @ 11:52 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:32 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06460025
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-14
First Post:
2024-05-26
Brief Title:
Compare Wound Sampling Methods Efficacy in Microbiology Culture
Sponsor:
Peking University Third Hospital
Organization:
Peking University Third Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Slough in Acute or Chronic Wounds for the Diagnosis of Microbiology Cultivation
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Slough was a visible indicator of biofilm which was the most available specimen from acute and chronic wounds However studies believed that slough were poorly accurate and that the Levine swab was more recommended for sampling bacterial culture This study aimed to compare slough with swab sample and analyze the consistency
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None