Viewing Study NCT06454253



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-06-16 @ 11:52 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:31 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06454253
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-06-12
First Post: 2024-05-29

Brief Title: Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right Colon Cancer a 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study
Sponsor: Taiyuan Li
Organization: Nanchang University

Study Overview

Official Title: the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted right colon group for cancer compared to laparoscopic-assisted right colon group This is a large sample study based on ten years of clinical data The main question it aims to answer is What are the advantages of da Vinci robot right hemicolectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and is there a difference in long-term efficacy between the two methods
Detailed Description: Colorectal cancer CRC is highly prevalent worldwide In China CRC ranks high among the population of men and women with cancer The incidence and mortality rates of CRC are rising quickly in developing countries and it is the fourth most deadly cancer in the world In particular the right colon cancer RCC is continuously growing in China and the early symptoms of RCC are not typical one of the most useful ways for RCC is surgical is a surgical operation Along with the development of minimally invasive surgery the use of laparoscopy for colon cancer is widely accepted and has become one symbolic surgical technology Studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colonic surgery is related to reduced pain after operation shorter rehabilitation time shorter length of hospital stay reduced the time of ileus after surgery and reduced surgical site infection

Nevertheless laparoscopic surgery also has its shortcoming including a limited range of motion slow learning and growth and physiological tremor cannot be eliminatedThe emergence of robots has broken the inherent disadvantage of laparoscopy It has achieved similar or better results in previous studies Based on these advantages robotic surgery has received much attention from the surgeons With the first robotic surgery in the field of colon cancer was reported in 2002 there are some studies proved the safety and feasibility by using robotHowever most studies with small sample sizes and with cases at a relatively early stage

Therefore the purpose of this study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between RARC and LARC in the treatment of right colon cancer in our center

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None