Ignite Creation Date:
2024-06-16 @ 11:51 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:31 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06441175
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-04
First Post:
2024-05-28
Brief Title:
Effectiveness of Cricoid Pressure During Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy
Sponsor:
Seoul National University Hospital
Organization:
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cricoid Pressure on Upper Esophageal Obstruction During Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy a Randomized Crossover Study
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Compare the success rate of upper esophageal obstruction with cricoid pressure during videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy
Detailed Description:
Even with appropriate cricoid pressure the lifting force of the laryngoscope during direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation may counteract the cricoid pressure making esophageal obstruction ineffective Compared to direct laryngoscopy videolaryngoscopy requires less lifting force and thus the success rate of esophageal obstruction may be higher This study aims to compare the success rate of upper esophageal obstruction with cricoid pressure during videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None