Viewing Study NCT02352961


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 1:00 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-02 @ 3:41 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02352961
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2016-01-28
First Post: 2015-01-28
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: An Implementation Science Study Investigating Profiles of Men Interested in MMC
Sponsor: The Aurum Institute NPC
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: An Implementation Science Study Investigating Profiles of Men Interested in Medical Male Circumcision (MMC), Barriers and Methods to Increase the Uptake of MMC Among Older Men in South Africa
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2016-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: Imbizo
Brief Summary: There are both supply and demand gaps in our understanding of how best to implement MMC services. In terms of supply of MMC services, there is a need to better understand what the best way is of efficiently accessing mature men(25-49 years old) . The investigators also want to understand the type of service delivery approach and environment that would make mature men(25-49 years old) feel more comfortable when attending an MMC clinic. Demand of MMC requires identifying messaging that works to address mature men's (25-49 years old) issues so that they might be willing to undergo MMC. To further advance HIV prevention and advocacy of male circumcision the investigators also need to consider the perspectives of women on what approach MMC messaging should take. A combination of male and female viewpoints could inform MMC outreach messaging where IEC materials are tailored to address the barriers to MMC. Identifying the specific barriers to MMC among males and including the perspectives
Detailed Description: Part I (Formative Period) Given these issues, in addition to establishing a baseline estimate of the ages and risk behaviours of males currently undergoing MMC at the Aurum clinic over a six month period, we include a qualitative research component. We conducted research in 2014 to establish a baseline estimate of the ages and risk behaviours of males undergoing MMC at the Aurum clinic over a six month period. The baseline estimate (Ethics reference number M130711) will be referred to as the formative Part I. The formative Part I includes a quantitative and qualitative research component. The qualitative component will include both genders and be used to develop MMC recruitment messaging tailored to mature men(25-49 years old) . Men will provide their opinion on circumcision and on what type of marketing message they feel will encourage mature men (25-49 years old) to be circumcised. Women will also provide their perspectives on male circumcision and what messaging could be used to encourage their partners or male family members to be circumcised. During this study, we explored if women have a role in promoting male circumcision to their partners, family and the community. These qualitative findings will be used to develop interventions to increase the ratio of men (25-49 years old) mature, or at least of higher risk men, undergoing MMC at the clinic. These interventions and the outcomes related to them will be presented as an amendment to this protocol after the baseline and qualitative data are collected and analysed.

Part II (Intervention Period) Findings from the formative period will be used to develop interventions to increase the ratio of men (25-49 years)mature, or at least of higher risk men, undergoing MMC at the clinic. During this proposed intervention period we would like to evaluate the effectiveness of those interventions and the outcomes related to them. These proposed interventions will directly address the barriers to MMC that challenge uptake of MMC among mature men (25-49 years). Additionally, epidemiologic research will be conducted among men attending our MMC clinic to evaluate whether mature men (25-49 years) exhibit, as is presumed, higher risk profiles for HIV. We will also explore the cost-effectiveness of this strategy.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: