Viewing Study NCT06439186



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-06-16 @ 11:50 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:31 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06439186
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-06-03
First Post: 2024-05-02

Brief Title: The Use of Infiltrative Anesthesia Instead of Inferior Alveolar Block
Sponsor: Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
Organization: Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

Study Overview

Official Title: Infiltrative Anesthesia With Lidocaine Can Replace The Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block In Extraction of Devitalized Mandibular Molar Teeth
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Generally it is accepted that infiltrative anesthesia IA is not sufficient for extraction of lower molars and that an inferior alveolar nerve block IANB is needed In this study it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of IANB and IA in extraction of devitalized mandibular molars

Sixty subjects are randomly divided into study n30 and control n30 groups Lidocaine with epinephrine is used for all injections In the study group only vestibular and lingual IA will be used In the control group IANB will be applied Teeth were extracted as usual The pain felt during extraction will be compared
Detailed Description: It has been taught in dental curricula that using only infiltrative anesthesia IA is not sufficient for extraction of lower molars and that an inferior alveolar nerve block IANB is needed However it is also well-known that dental implants can be inserted into mandibular posterior region using only IA

It can be claimed that there is no difference regarding the need for anesthesia between extracting a devitalized tooth and placing an implant in the same area In this study it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of IANB and IA in extraction of mandibular molars that had previously undergone root canal treatment

The study is as a prospective randomized and non blinded clinical trial All procedures are carried out at Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry The inclusion criteria are age 18 years the tooth to be extracted is a mandibular first or second molar with a previously completed root canal treatment The patients allergic to local anesthetics those with severely mobile teeth those had severe pain due to an acute infection and the patients using psychotropic drugs are excluded

Sixty subjects are randomly divided into study n30 and control n30 groups An anesthetic solution containing 20 mgmL of lidocaine and 00125 mgmL of epinephrine was used in all subjects In the study group only vestibular and lingual IA will be used In the control group IANB will be applied The teeth will be extracted as usual Using a visual analog scale VAS the pain felt during extraction will be separately recorded Mann-Whitney U test will be used for statistical analysis Statistical significance is defined as p05

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None