Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:43 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 5:21 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07283003
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-12-22
First Post:
2025-11-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluating Postoperative Pain After Ureterorenoscopy.
Sponsor:
Lukas J Hefermehl
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Prospective Randomized Study on the Necessity of Postoperative Stenting After Ureteroscopy (URS) for Ureteral Stones.
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
STENTIMENT
Brief Summary:
Comparison of routine postoperative stenting versus no stenting after ureterorenoscopy for ureteral stones to assess the necessity and impact on complication risk.
Detailed Description:
After a ureteroscopy (URS) for the removal of ureteral stones, a double-J stent is routinely placed. Among other measures, this is intended to prevent pain caused by ureteral swelling, small residual fragments, blood clots, and potential drainage obstructions, which could lead to colic or fever. However, the evidence supporting the benefit of this practice is limited. At the same time, many patients report discomfort due to the stent (e.g., flank pain, dysuria, frequent urination, hematuria), which can significantly impact their quality of life.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: