Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-19 @ 5:33 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:29 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06418841
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-17
First Post:
2024-05-14
Brief Title:
A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Versus Conventional Midline Approach for Lumbar Puncture
Sponsor:
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Organization:
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Versus Conventional Midline Approach for Lumbar Puncture
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group group A or the MAT treatment group group B Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP the puncture success rate pain assessment in the back head and legs and the occurrence of complications have different
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None