Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-11 @ 8:30 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:29 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06409104
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-14
First Post:
2024-05-07
Brief Title:
Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Cancer Patients Undergoing ERCP
Sponsor:
National Cancer Institute Egypt
Organization:
National Cancer Institute Egypt
Study Overview
Official Title:
Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Cancer Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography Randomized Single Blinded Controlled Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol and dexmedetomidine during ERCP regarding hemodynamic respiratory sedative and cognitive functions
Detailed Description:
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ERCP plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary pathologies and its use has increased in recent years The procedure lasts from 30 to 60 position Patients usually cannot tolerate the procedure because of pain uncomfortable position fear and nausea without adequate sedation therefore ERCP is generally performed under moderate to deep sedation or even GA ERCP under general anesthesia has several limitations The procedure is often prolonged due to extra time required for patient preparation induction of anesthesia tracheal intubation and recovery In addition the cost per procedure is higher Deep sedation on the other hand is an alternative that is used by specific centers under anesthesiologist supervision instead of general anesthesia Deep sedation has the advantage of offering the extra time required for general anesthesia and better procedure conditions in relation to conscious sedation
Propofol is a popular drug that is frequently used in day surgery because of its early onset activity short duration of action and the fact that the patient regains normal mental functions only minutes after intravenous application However an increased dose of propofol may cause undesirable side effects such as hypoxia which is a common occurrence during upper GI endoscopy under sedation with propofol prolonged hypoxia is the most common cause of cardiac arrhythmia and coronary ischemia Also propofol lacks adequate analgesic effects to inhibit visceral traction pain other side effects of propofol include hypotension and apnea
In recent years dexmedetomidine has been used as an alternative to Propofol in conscious sedation applications Because it provides sedation and analgesia but does not cause respiratory depression dexmedetomidine is considered a suitable drug for operations that are performed under local anesthesia
According to authors best knowledge there are no enough studies comparing both drugs in patients undergoing ERCP
Aim of the work The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol and dexmedetomidine during ERCP regarding hemodynamic respiratory sedative and cognitive functions
Objectives
To compare the hemodynamic profile of dexmedetomidine and Propofol during sedation in patients undergoing ERCP
To study both agents effect on respiratory complications
To demonstrate the effect of both drugs on cognitive functions
To assess the effect of both drugs on the duration of the procedure and the number of interruptions
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine will provide better sedation and analgesia with fewer side effects when compared to propofol in patients undergoing ERCP
Propofol is a popular drug that is frequently used in day surgery because of its early onset activity short duration of action and the fact that the patient regains normal mental functions only minutes after intravenous application However an increased dose of propofol may cause undesirable side effects such as hypoxia which is a common occurrence during upper GI endoscopy under sedation with propofol prolonged hypoxia is the most common cause of cardiac arrhythmia and coronary ischemia Also propofol lacks adequate analgesic effects to inhibit visceral traction pain other side effects of propofol include hypotension and apnea
In recent years dexmedetomidine has been used as an alternative to Propofol in conscious sedation applications Because it provides sedation and analgesia but does not cause respiratory depression dexmedetomidine is considered a suitable drug for operations that are performed under local anesthesia
According to authors best knowledge there are no enough studies comparing both drugs in patients undergoing ERCP
Aim of the work The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol and dexmedetomidine during ERCP regarding hemodynamic respiratory sedative and cognitive functions
Objectives
To compare the hemodynamic profile of dexmedetomidine and Propofol during sedation in patients undergoing ERCP
To study both agents effect on respiratory complications
To demonstrate the effect of both drugs on cognitive functions
To assess the effect of both drugs on the duration of the procedure and the number of interruptions
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine will provide better sedation and analgesia with fewer side effects when compared to propofol in patients undergoing ERCP
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None