Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:28 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:28 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06393634
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-09
First Post:
2024-04-26
Brief Title:
Comparing Direct and Indirect Detection Methods of Multiple Routes of Testosterone Administration
Sponsor:
Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory
Organization:
Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing Direct and Indirect Detection Methods Following Multiple Routes of Testosterone administration-an Anti-doping Perspective
Status:
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
T esters
Brief Summary:
Testosterone abuse is extremely prevalent in athletes globally and especially in the United States professional sporting leagues
Detailed Description:
Because human bodies make testosterone naturally it can be difficult to determine whether the testosterone in your body is natural or if it came from administering testosterone Currently testosterone abuse by athletes is detected by anti-doping laboratories in urine samples and use can also be inferred by testing blood samples As a pharmaceutical preparation testosterone is available to administer to your body in different ways However due to lack of controlled data on the various preparations of testosterone administrations related to the anti-doping field this study id designed to look at five different testosterone preparations delivered three different ways and how they compare to each other in terms of anti-doping detection and how long they will be in circulation in your body
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None