Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:25 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06377423
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-22
First Post:
2024-04-11
Brief Title:
Comparison Between Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases
Sponsor:
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Organization:
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Clinical Trial on Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases 2-years Follow-up
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Thus the present study aimed to evaluate the longevity of direct composite compared to indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases using USPHS criteria The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performance of direct composite and indirect ceramic laminate veneers in multiple diastema closure cases over two years
Detailed Description:
Restorative materials and curing device In the current study the manufacturers instructions were followed for the use of the nanofilled composite resin Estelite Asteria Tokuyama Dental Japan for direct laminate veneers and IPS emax Press Ivoclar Vivadent Amherst NY USA for indirect laminate ceramic veneers A light curing device with an output density of 655 mWcm2 LED Bluephase C5 Ivoclar Vivadent Amherst NY USA was used Demetron LED light meters were used to measure the light curing units intensity regularly Demetron Research Corp Danbury CT USA Brand name description chemical composition and manufacturers of the materials are presented in Table 1
Study design blinding randomization The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement was adhered to in the description of the experimental design This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial that was double-blinded for both trial participants and outcome assessors Randomization was performed using the flip of a coin for the choice of material Using computerized sequence generating www randomizerorg participants were divided into two groups with a 11 allocation ratio
Study design blinding randomization The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement was adhered to in the description of the experimental design This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial that was double-blinded for both trial participants and outcome assessors Randomization was performed using the flip of a coin for the choice of material Using computerized sequence generating www randomizerorg participants were divided into two groups with a 11 allocation ratio
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None