Viewing Study NCT06375967



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 8:24 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:27 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06375967
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-04-19
First Post: 2024-04-16

Brief Title: EUS-Gallbladder vs CDS as First Line in MBDO- Palliative CARPEGIEM Trial
Sponsor: Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Organization: Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Study Overview

Official Title: Multicenter Study of EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Choledochoduodenostomy as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Palliative Patients CARPEGIEM Trial an Open-label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: CARPEGIEM
Brief Summary: The aim of the study is to evaluate technical clinical and safety outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stent LAMS with a coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent DPS in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies vs cholcystogastrostomy for the management of malignant biliary obstruction in palliative patients
Detailed Description: Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy EUS-CDS with a biliary lumen-apposing metal stent LAMS has been widely accepted as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction MDBO Recent studies DRAMBO and ELEMENT trial compared EUS-CDS vs ERCP as a first line treatment in MDBO in palliative patients showing similar clinical and techinal success and adverse events rate between both techniques demonstrating that both procedures could be options for primary biliary drainage in unresectable MDBO

Furthermore a recent clinical trial BAMPI trial has proven that the addition of a coaxial double pigtail DPS offers benefits in terms of safey and clinical success

In the last years there has been an increasing interest for the EUS-guided gallblader drainage EUS-GBD in unresectable MDBO as an alternative for EUS-CDS and recent studies and reviews have been reported with acceptable techinal and clinical success but no clinical trial has been performed up to date

Our hypothesis is that EUS-GBD may offer benefits in terms of safety over EUS-CDS maintaining similar clinical and techinal success rates

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None