Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:24 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06369506
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-17
First Post:
2024-04-09
Brief Title:
Evaluation of Gingival Thickness Measurement at Different Anatomical Landmarks
Sponsor:
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Organization:
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Classification of Gingival Phenotype at Different Landmarks
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
In this study the point at which gingival thickness GT should be measured was investigated Measurements were made from three different points It was classified as thin and thick in two ways according to the average of these three different points and the point corresponding to the base of the gingival groove which is frequently used in the literature And these two classifications were compared
Detailed Description:
The morphology of the soft tissue around the teeth buccolingual GT and keratinized gingival width is defined as the gingival phenotype One of the most important considerations when assessing gingival phenotype is the objective quantification of GT and various methods have been used to measure GT However there is no clear consensus in the literature regarding the anatomical point where GT is measured in the buccal region For this reason it is thought that measurements made from different points also affect the classification of gingival phenotype The aim of this study was to investigate the cut-off values in clinical parameters according to the average GT value of different measurement points and the GT value at a single point
The study was designed as cross-sectional study Participants were divided into two groups based on thin and thick gingival phenotypes in two different classifications The first classification was based on the GT measurement taken from the base of the gingival sulcus while the second classification was based on the average of GT measurements taken from three points base of the gingival sulcus 1 mm apical to the base of the gingival sulcus and 2 mm apical to the base of the gingival sulcus Other clinical and morphological parameters of the participants who were divided into two groups thin and thick according to these classifications were also measured with a digital caliper and periodontal probe These parameters are keratinized gingival width KGW gingival groove depth SD crown width CW crown length CL crown widthcrown length CWCL papilla height PH gingival angle GA is Among these parameters the unit of measurement for GA is angle CWCL is the ratio Other measurements were measured in mm For all parameters cut-off values were obtained through statistical measurements made according to two classifications And these measurements were compared In addition the compatibility of the GT measurements of the three points with each other was also examined
Participants Ondokuz Mayis Universitys Clinical Research Ethics Board approved the consent form and study protocol 2102021 Participants with 1195 teeth sites were enrolled in the study from September 2022 to August 2023 Participants were recruited from University Ondokuz Mayis included patients dental hygiene students A single calibrated examiner SY performed all clinical and morphological measurements
The study was designed as cross-sectional study Participants were divided into two groups based on thin and thick gingival phenotypes in two different classifications The first classification was based on the GT measurement taken from the base of the gingival sulcus while the second classification was based on the average of GT measurements taken from three points base of the gingival sulcus 1 mm apical to the base of the gingival sulcus and 2 mm apical to the base of the gingival sulcus Other clinical and morphological parameters of the participants who were divided into two groups thin and thick according to these classifications were also measured with a digital caliper and periodontal probe These parameters are keratinized gingival width KGW gingival groove depth SD crown width CW crown length CL crown widthcrown length CWCL papilla height PH gingival angle GA is Among these parameters the unit of measurement for GA is angle CWCL is the ratio Other measurements were measured in mm For all parameters cut-off values were obtained through statistical measurements made according to two classifications And these measurements were compared In addition the compatibility of the GT measurements of the three points with each other was also examined
Participants Ondokuz Mayis Universitys Clinical Research Ethics Board approved the consent form and study protocol 2102021 Participants with 1195 teeth sites were enrolled in the study from September 2022 to August 2023 Participants were recruited from University Ondokuz Mayis included patients dental hygiene students A single calibrated examiner SY performed all clinical and morphological measurements
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None