Viewing Study NCT06362551



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 8:23 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:26 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06362551
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-04-12
First Post: 2024-04-08

Brief Title: Oocyte Donor Application Discrepancies
Sponsor: Inception Fertility LLC
Organization: Inception Fertility LLC

Study Overview

Official Title: Retrospective Analysis of Differences in Information Provided by Donor Applicants Obtained by Written Application Compared to Genetic Risk Assessment Performed by Certified Genetic Counselor as Part of Routine Screening Process
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Retrospective observational study comparing information received on Inception Central Donor Recruitments standardized online egg donor application compared to information reported during a Genetic Risk Assessment GRA consultation with a certified genetic counselor with contracted third party genetic counseling service GeneScreen All donor applicants completing a full application with Inceptions Central Donor Recruitment and a GRA consultation with GeneScreen will be included
Detailed Description: Background Historically it has been considered sufficient to have an egg donor applicant complete a written application that is reviewed by an egg donor program for acceptability In 2021 ASRM put forth recommendations that family history review and assessment of donors should be performed by a certified genetic counselor In 2022 Inception Central Donor Recruitment CDR established a process for screening donor applicants that included Genetic Risk Assessment GRA with a certified genetic counselor This study seeks to illustrate the discrepancies between personal and family history information documented on a standardized online application compared to a GRA consultation with a certified genetic counselor

Objectives Investigate the rate of new information obtained at GRA which was not included in the full application as follows

New information with no change to health risk assessment ie change in number of relatives
New information with a change to health risk assessment ie known or suspected diagnoses for OD or family with one of the following decisions

Still acceptableapproved for clinic ie new multifactorial condition reported such as diabetes
Decline based on TPN internal guidelines alone ie meets NCCN criteria for genetic testing
Decline based on ASRM guidelines ie first degree relative with a major malformation

Hypothesis Information obtained through GRA with a certified genetic counselor will lead to more detailed and accurate assessment of donor applicant eligibility Some information obtained through GRA which was not apparent on application will lead to a donor applicant being declined based on internal Prelude Network Donor Screening Guidelines andor guidelines set forth by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None