Viewing Study NCT06351137



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 8:22 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:26 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06351137
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-04-08
First Post: 2024-03-08

Brief Title: Timecost of Intranasal Versus Intravenous Analgesia in Traumatic Pain
Sponsor: Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam AMC-UvA
Organization: Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam AMC-UvA

Study Overview

Official Title: Timecost of Intranasal Versus Intravenous Analgesia in Traumatic Pain
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Prehospital treatment of acute traumatic pain is common in military practice Analgesics are usually administered intravenously IV Research from the civil prehospital environment shows that obtaining IV access can be difficult and time consuming delaying onset of treatment The challenges for obtaining IV access in the military prehospital setting are even bigger for example in combat environments However this has not been assessed

Current guidelines also offer alternative routes of administration for analgesics for example intranasal IN administration IN administration is a fast easy and effective route of administration This study determines whether IN administration of analgesia is faster and leads to increased healthcare provider satisfaction compared to IV administration in patients with acute traumatic pain in a simulated military prehospital environment
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None