Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:21 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:26 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06354647
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-10
First Post:
2024-04-03
Brief Title:
Zirconia-based Primary Anterior Crowns With Retention Grooves Versus Without Retention Grooves
Sponsor:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Organization:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Zirconia-based Crowns With Retention Grooves Sprig EZ Versus Without Retention Grooves NuSmile ZR for Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth A Parallel-arm Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this research study is to test the effectiveness of two different crownscaps on teeth for restoration of primary anterior teeth The two different materials of crowns are esthetic crowns with retentive grooves and without retentive crowns These crowns are placed on the teeth to restore function esthetics and prevent further caries and infection
Detailed Description:
There are many treatment options available for restoring primary anterior teeth A clinicians decision to opt for any specific treatment option is based on multiple factors such as the clinicians liking of a specific material or method esthetic demands by parents the childs behavior and moisture and hemorrhage control Out of many treatment options preformed zirconia crowns for primary teeth have been available for over a decade There is insufficient research that compares the success of anterior pediatric zirconia crowns with and without retentive grooves
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None