Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:21 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:25 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06343441
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-02
First Post:
2024-03-20
Brief Title:
Accuracy of Two Methods of Making Impressions for Complete-arch Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis
Sponsor:
Shanghai Ninth Peoples Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Organization:
Shanghai Ninth Peoples Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effectiveness of Two Methods of Taking Impressions for an Implant-supported Fixed Prostheses With One-piece Titanium Frameworks in Edentulous Jaws
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To compare the accuracy of digital impression and conventional impression for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis
Detailed Description:
The Intraoral scan is digital optical scan method that has advantages such as being more comfortable easy to transfer and full digital workflow Conventional impression using silicon rubber and gained stable accuracy of impression This study aims to compare the accuracy of two methods
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None