Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:20 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:25 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06342869
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-02
First Post:
2024-02-28
Brief Title:
Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine Used for Buccal Infiltration and Supplemental Palatinal Infiltration Anesthesia in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
Sponsor:
Akdeniz University
Organization:
Akdeniz University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine Used for Buccal Infiltration and Supplemental Palatinal Infiltration Anesthesia in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effects of articaine or lidocaine in buccal infiltration or palatal infiltration in addition to buccal infiltration in maxillary first or second molars with irreversible pulpitis
Method Among the patients who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry Endodontic Clinic for the treatment of maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis 80 volunteers who met the criteria were included in the study Eighty patients were divided into 4 groups n 20 1 group buccal infiltration with 4 articaine containing 1100000 epinephrine 2 group buccal infiltration with 2 lidocaine containing 80000 epinephrine 3 group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 4 articaine containing 1100000 epinephrine 4group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 2 lidocaine containing 80000 epinephrine Pain during the endodontic procedure was determined and recorded according to the Heft Parker visual analog scale
Method Among the patients who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry Endodontic Clinic for the treatment of maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis 80 volunteers who met the criteria were included in the study Eighty patients were divided into 4 groups n 20 1 group buccal infiltration with 4 articaine containing 1100000 epinephrine 2 group buccal infiltration with 2 lidocaine containing 80000 epinephrine 3 group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 4 articaine containing 1100000 epinephrine 4group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 2 lidocaine containing 80000 epinephrine Pain during the endodontic procedure was determined and recorded according to the Heft Parker visual analog scale
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None