Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:15 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:24 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06319261
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-20
First Post:
2024-03-04
Brief Title:
Efficacy of Guided Biofilm Therapy GBT for Treatment of Deep Periodontal Pockets
Sponsor:
University of Baghdad
Organization:
University of Baghdad
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy of Guided Biofilm Therapy GBT for Treatment of Deep Periodontal Pockets A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of guided biofilm therapy GBT for treatment of deep periodontal pockets
the objectives are
1- To compare the change in the clinical periodontal parameters and microbiological parameters by using real time PCR for P gingivalis Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Filifactor alocis among sites treated by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation after a period of 3 months and to assess the level of the selected periodontal pathogens in deep periodontal pockets and to estimate and compare deep periodontal pockets which need surgery after 3 months of non-surgical treatment by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation
the hypothesis is whether there are no differences in in the clinical and microbiological parameters among sites treated by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation after a period of 3 months or there are differences in in the clinical and microbiological parameters among sites treated by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation after a period of 3 months
The participants will be selected on a consecutive basis from patients referred to the Department of Periodontics College of Dentistry University of Baghdad
For each patient each site will be randomly assigned to either treatment protocol
1 Sites treated with GBT
2 Sites treated with conventional manual instrumentation only
the objectives are
1- To compare the change in the clinical periodontal parameters and microbiological parameters by using real time PCR for P gingivalis Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Filifactor alocis among sites treated by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation after a period of 3 months and to assess the level of the selected periodontal pathogens in deep periodontal pockets and to estimate and compare deep periodontal pockets which need surgery after 3 months of non-surgical treatment by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation
the hypothesis is whether there are no differences in in the clinical and microbiological parameters among sites treated by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation after a period of 3 months or there are differences in in the clinical and microbiological parameters among sites treated by GBT and conventional hand instrumentation after a period of 3 months
The participants will be selected on a consecutive basis from patients referred to the Department of Periodontics College of Dentistry University of Baghdad
For each patient each site will be randomly assigned to either treatment protocol
1 Sites treated with GBT
2 Sites treated with conventional manual instrumentation only
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None