Viewing Study NCT06315192



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 8:15 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:24 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06315192
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-03-18
First Post: 2024-03-11

Brief Title: Stroke Alarm Efficacy Trial
Sponsor: Region Skane
Organization: Region Skane

Study Overview

Official Title: Stroke Alarm Efficacy Trial
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: StrokeAlarmEFF
Brief Summary: The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of the CE-marked wearable system Stroke Alarm to identify the onset of a stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset

This is a multicenter prospective observational single-arm trial with a registry-based propensity matched control population

A total of 500 patients will be included in the trial An interim analysis will determine if the stroke onset frequency is sufficient to determine the main outcome Should the number of stroke events differ from what is expected at interim analysis study enrollment will continue to increase cohort size

Patients who meet the criteria for participation will after signing consent be included and receive the Stroke Alarm bracelets that are used for 3 months Study data will be collected as baseline at inclusion at follow-up 3 months after inclusion and by using national Swedish registry data after completion of the study

Patients with elevated stroke risk according assessed by presence of specific criteria associated with elevated risk caused by

1 recent TIA OR
2 recent stroke without persisting arm motor deficit OR
3 atrial fibrillation A control population matched for age sex NIHSS score and health care region will be identified in the Swedish national stroke registry Riksstroke and used for comparison

The combined efficacy goal is at least 60 sensitivity for Stroke Alarm b of stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset with a 95 confidence interval above 30 and a specificity of at least 80 using a clinical stroke diagnosis as gold standard
Detailed Description: Objectives and hypotheses of the clinical investigation The aim of this study is to test the ability and efficacy of the CE-marked wearable system Stroke Alarm to detect a stroke onset early

The hypothesis is that the Stroke Alarm is able to indicate at least 60 of stroke cases with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset with a specificity of at least 80

Design of the clinical investigation This is a prospective single arm observational trial with a propensity-matched registry-derived control group

All patients with a diagnosis of stroke ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage without arm motor deficits TIA or atrial fibrillation at the participating hospitals that fullfill all inclusion critera and no exclusion criteria is asked for participation in the trial

The patient is after the setup wearing the device continuously for three months

An administrative follow-up is performed at 90-120 days following inclusion the EPR is reviewed for any hospital admissions for stroke during the study period

No standard care comparator will be used in this study mainly because of lack of similar systems to compare with and blinding issues

Simultaneous inclusion in other studies that require bracelets are not permitted but inclusion in other clinical treatment trials such as for drugs och medical devices that does not require bracelets are acceptable

Study population All patients age 60 years with a diagnosis of stroke ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage without arm motor deficits TIA or atrial fibrillation at the participating hospitals is candidates for participation in the trial

Enrollment Patients with a diagnosis of stroke ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage without arm motor deficits TIA or atrial fibrillation that fullfill all inclusion and no exclusion criteria are included after signing the informed consent form at inclusion visit after oral and written information within the hospital or at an out-patient facility described in Informed consent process section 16

Included subjects are added to the identification log stored in the Investigators Site File ISF that is located in locked research offices at the participating hospitals The Identification log is under no circumstances shared or moved from the ISF that is located at participating hospital

The patients are instructed to use the device continuously for three months When setting-up the app on their smartphones they will be required to add at least one alarm recipient but adding more alarm recipients is encouraged The recipients are independent of study design and can be family members friends or neighbors as preferred by the subjects

Device startup The study nurses manage the inclusion procedure that are recorded in the EPR and the administrative system according to the local regulations of the including center

The wearable stroke indication system is given to the patient when accepting inclusion in the trial The system will include a user manual with step-by-step instructions that are used during the activation of the investigational device Stroke Alarm The Study nurse may also assist in activation including adding alarm recipients which is exactly the same as expected during clinical routine use

The product is designed for continuous use for up to 6 months in a home environment and can also be used in a hospital environment The devices will not be re-used for another subject and collected by the manufacturer at the end of the study

The device is not MR-compatible The included patient is the user of the device Each participant will receive one unit of Stroke Alarm consisting of a pair of sensor bracelets and one IFU The smartphone app is downloaded from Apples AppStore iOS or via Google Play Android Other operative systems cant be used

The device is intended to be used continuously during the entire study period of 90 days During the study the user is instructed to use the device according to the IFU The user is instructed to use the device in hisher regular activities in the home environment continuously during the entire study period

For the device to be fully functional the user needs to activate and wear both sensor bracelets install the Stroke Alarm app complete the on-boarding and have at least one alarm recipient who has accepted the invitation to act as alarm recipient Also for the device to be fully functional the user needs to be within Bluetooth connection from hisher smartphone the smartphone needs to be active and have wifi- or 3G4G5G internet access

At startup the user invites Alarm recipients who will be alerted via SMS messages in case the device indicates stroke by identifying arm motor deficiency that may be consistent with stroke and the initial indication is not abolished by the user Any number of Alarm recipients can be chosen typically they may be relatives neighbors and friends An Alarm recipient is not registered to the system unless heshe accepts hisher role as an Alarm recipient for the user At least one confirmed Alarm recipient is necessary for the system to be operational Alarm recipients can be added or removed during the study period The choice of and role for the Alarm recipients is identical in the study as in regular use That means that the user will select Alarm recipients based on hisher own preferences and they are supposed to react to any alarms from the device as they would to the device in regular use An Alarm recipient is not a study subject and no informed consent is obtained The identity of the Alarm recipients is not collected in the study

During setup are the user testing the stroke test Appendix A that consists of 8 questionstasks designed to mimic the items tested by the NIHSS and the different types of sound andor vibration alarms described below and appendix for better understanding of the differences between them

Similar to regular use of the device the study subjects may contact the manufacturers support-service for questions and support related to the device

Alarm description A false indication is an indication made by the algorithm from imbalance of arm activity in the absence of a stroke It can occur during everyday activity dominated by one arm It will lead to a false alarm if it is not abolished by user tests

Dedicated arm motion Escalation step 1 Figure 2 is a specified gesture draw a ball in the airamp34 that is used to identify erroneous indications

In-app test Escalation step 2 Figure 2 is the test included in the Stroke Alarm smartphone app intended to abolish erroneous indications that are not eliminated by a dedicated arm motion Escalation step 1

A false alarm is a SMS alarm sent to the Alarm recipients based on an initial false indication made by the algorithm in the absence of a stroke with unilateral arm motor defecit

SMS messages to the Alarm recipients generated by technical problems that affect the function of the device for example loss of internet-connection or loss of Bluetooth-connection is not considered false alarms

If the user suffers a stroke and is not able to alert himselfherself and an arm paresis associated with the stroke is detected by the device this will first generate a true indication manifested as vibration in the bracelet of the affected arm If the user does not abolish this indication by a dedication arm movement it will trigger a local alarm in the smartphone within 30 seconds If the user does not open the smartphone app and complete the in-app stroke test within 10 minutes a SMS alarm is sent to all Alarm recipients Alarm recipients are then expected to promptly act to ensure that the user is either confirmed to be well or is taken care of by healthcare similar as if the user had called for help by any other means

If the user suffers a stroke with unilateral arm weakness and is not able to alert himselfherself and no arm paresis is detected by the device false negative the device have not contributed to patient care and stroke diagnosis similar to if the device not was present In this case the workflow is the same as without the device which means that the patient will need to alert healthcare himselfherself of by help of others who may be present at onset or who may discover the patient at a later timepoint

The device does not contact health care services This contact must be initiated by the user or by Alarm recipients alerted by the device or other means

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None