Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:09 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:22 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06278753
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-02-26
First Post:
2022-01-04
Brief Title:
Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy
Sponsor:
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy Used to Evaluate Lower Urinary Tract Damage After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared
Detailed Description:
It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy In addition with this study it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None