Viewing Study NCT06242639



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 8:04 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:20 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06242639
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-02-05
First Post: 2024-01-19

Brief Title: Metal-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated With Laser Sintering
Sponsor: Cukurova University
Organization: Cukurova University

Study Overview

Official Title: Clinical Acceptability of Metal-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated With Laser Sintering Technique An up to 7- Year Retrospective Clinical Study
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical acceptability of metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures FPD manufactured utilizing direct metal laser-sintering technology taking into account the short-term medium-term and long-term outcomes The Federation Dentaire International FDI World Dental Federation criteria were used to evaluate the esthetic functional and biological clinical acceptability of the patients who met the inclusion criteria
Detailed Description: Objectives To evaluate the clinical success of laser sintered metal-ceramic restorations throughout several time periods including the short medium and long term

Materials and methods Participants who had 3-unit metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures fabricated by laser sintering in the mandibular posterior region between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated The FDI criteria were used to evaluate the esthetic functional and biological clinical acceptability of the patients who met the inclusion criteria The surface luster was assessed and given a score in the field of esthetic properties The functional parameters were assessed and rated based on fracture marginal adaptation radiographic examination contact pointfood impaction and patient satisfaction The biological parameters assessed and rated included tooth vitality periodontal response mucosa and oral health Following the examinations each parameter was assigned a score ranging from 1 to 5 1Clinically excellentvery good 2Clinically good 3Clinically satisfactory 4Clinically unsatisfactory 5Clinically poor Scoring between 1 and 3 was deemed clinically acceptable whereas scoring 4 or 5 was deemed clinically unacceptable

Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None