Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:03 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:19 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06232148
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-02-01
First Post:
2024-01-20
Brief Title:
Cost Evaluation of Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
Sponsor:
Bispebjerg Hospital
Organization:
Bispebjerg Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Procedural Cost Analyses of Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair Compared With Laparoscopic or Open Repair A Cohort Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To evaluate the procedural cost of robotic ventral hernia repair compared with open ventral hernia repair
Detailed Description:
Ventral hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed elective surgeries worldwide The surgical approaches vary depending on the patient characteristics type and location the of ventral hernia as well as the surgeons preferences and equipment availability
The choice between an open or minimally invasive approach has been debated for years and it seems clear that the risk of wound infection is significantly decreased when choosing a minimally invasive approach whereas there are no significant difference in recurrence rates In the past decades the use of a robotic system for ventral hernia repair has gained increasing popularity due to an easy access to the preperitoneal or retromuscular plane with a minimally invasive technique
Two nationwide cohort studies concluded that length of stay and postoperative morbidity was decreased for robot-assisted repairs compared to open or laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs Critics of robot-assisted surgery argue that it is time-consuming too expensive and that further cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to weigh the clinical benefits
The aim of these studies was to compare the procedure-specific cost of robot-assisted with open primary ventral and incisional hernia repair and thereafter with laparoscopic repairs
The choice between an open or minimally invasive approach has been debated for years and it seems clear that the risk of wound infection is significantly decreased when choosing a minimally invasive approach whereas there are no significant difference in recurrence rates In the past decades the use of a robotic system for ventral hernia repair has gained increasing popularity due to an easy access to the preperitoneal or retromuscular plane with a minimally invasive technique
Two nationwide cohort studies concluded that length of stay and postoperative morbidity was decreased for robot-assisted repairs compared to open or laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs Critics of robot-assisted surgery argue that it is time-consuming too expensive and that further cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to weigh the clinical benefits
The aim of these studies was to compare the procedure-specific cost of robot-assisted with open primary ventral and incisional hernia repair and thereafter with laparoscopic repairs
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None