Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:59 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:18 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06206109
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-01-18
First Post:
2024-01-04
Brief Title:
The Effect of Tendon Tears on Lateral Epicondylitis
Sponsor:
Dokuz Eylul University
Organization:
Dokuz Eylul University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Is There a Relationship Between The Common Extensor Tendon Tears and Clinical-Ultrasonographic Changes in Lateral Epicondylitis
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Common extensor tendon CET tears that can be detected with ultrasonography US may be associated with worsening clinical and other ultrasonographic parameters in patients with LE In this retrospective evaluation of patients with lateral epicondylitis LE the effect of common extensor tendon CET tears revealed by ultrasonography US with demographic clinical and other US findings was investigated
Detailed Description:
The files of 227 patients with LE who applied to Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed retrospectively
The demographic characteristics of the patients were recorded
First of all common extensor tendon tears if it existed were demonstrated with ultrasonography Then primary and secondary outcome measures were performed
Maximum tendon thickness measurements capitellar - radiocapitellar and the presence of bone abnormality were detected with ultrasonography of the lateral epicondyle region of the humerus
The VAS was used to assess pain and was evaluated separately for pain at rest VAS-rest at night VAS-night and during ADL VAS-ADL
Force was applied on the lateral epicondyle using a standard pressure algometer Baseline to evaluate the patients sensitivity to pain The pressure at which the patient first felt pain and the average value in kgcm2 repeated three times were recorded
PRTEE consists of two sub-sections pain and function the severity of pain in the elbow and functional deficiencies The Turkish version of the PRTEE questionnaire was used
The hand dynamometer JAMAR was used to assess the hand grip strength The patient was positioned with sitting shoulder adduction elbow 90 flexion and forearm in a position between supination and pronation The average value in kilogram-force repeated three times Between repeated measures 1-minute resting periods were given
The demographic characteristics of the patients were recorded
First of all common extensor tendon tears if it existed were demonstrated with ultrasonography Then primary and secondary outcome measures were performed
Maximum tendon thickness measurements capitellar - radiocapitellar and the presence of bone abnormality were detected with ultrasonography of the lateral epicondyle region of the humerus
The VAS was used to assess pain and was evaluated separately for pain at rest VAS-rest at night VAS-night and during ADL VAS-ADL
Force was applied on the lateral epicondyle using a standard pressure algometer Baseline to evaluate the patients sensitivity to pain The pressure at which the patient first felt pain and the average value in kgcm2 repeated three times were recorded
PRTEE consists of two sub-sections pain and function the severity of pain in the elbow and functional deficiencies The Turkish version of the PRTEE questionnaire was used
The hand dynamometer JAMAR was used to assess the hand grip strength The patient was positioned with sitting shoulder adduction elbow 90 flexion and forearm in a position between supination and pronation The average value in kilogram-force repeated three times Between repeated measures 1-minute resting periods were given
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None