Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:55 PM
Last Modification Date:
2025-12-17 @ 11:15 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06181461
Status:
None
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-16 00:00:00
First Post:
2023-12-12 00:00:00
Brief Title:
Gong's Versus Kaltenborn Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Adhesive Capsulitis
Sponsor:
University of Lahore
Organization:
University of Lahore
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Gong's Versus Kaltenborn Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Status:
None
Status Verified Date:
2023-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This research is centered on the comparative effectiveness of Gong's and Kaltenborn's mobilization techniques in the treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis, addressing a significant void in current literature. Prior studies have individually showcased the efficacy of both techniques in enhancing pain relief, expanding range of motion, and improving functional outcomes among patients. However, a direct comparative analysis between Gong's and Kaltenborn's mobilization is conspicuously absent, prompting this study to unveil potential distinctions in their impact on shoulder pain, range of motion, and functional mobility.
The research design involves the random allocation of participants into two groups: Group A, receiving Gong's mobilization, and Group B, undergoing Kaltenborn's mobilization. This allocation will be done through a lottery method, ensuring a fair and unbiased selection process. The study will follow a single-blind design, with the assessor remaining unaware of the treatment group assignment.
Participants in both groups will also receive routine physical therapy, including 15 minutes of electrical muscle stimulation with heat therapy. This approach, supported by existing literature, aims to create a standardized baseline for assessing the additional impact of mobilization techniques. The study's duration is projected to be nine months, with data collection points at baseline, the end of 1.5 weeks, and the conclusion of the 3rd week.
Outcome variables include pain assessment using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, evaluation of function through the Shoulder Pain \& Disability Index, and measurement of range of motion using goniometry. Data collection will be performed by an assessor at specified intervals, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the interventions' effects over time.
Ultimately, this research aspires to contribute evidence-based insights into the relative effectiveness of Gong's and Kaltenborn's mobilization techniques, aiding clinicians in making informed decisions for optimal patient outcomes in the context of Adhesive Capsulitis.
The research design involves the random allocation of participants into two groups: Group A, receiving Gong's mobilization, and Group B, undergoing Kaltenborn's mobilization. This allocation will be done through a lottery method, ensuring a fair and unbiased selection process. The study will follow a single-blind design, with the assessor remaining unaware of the treatment group assignment.
Participants in both groups will also receive routine physical therapy, including 15 minutes of electrical muscle stimulation with heat therapy. This approach, supported by existing literature, aims to create a standardized baseline for assessing the additional impact of mobilization techniques. The study's duration is projected to be nine months, with data collection points at baseline, the end of 1.5 weeks, and the conclusion of the 3rd week.
Outcome variables include pain assessment using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, evaluation of function through the Shoulder Pain \& Disability Index, and measurement of range of motion using goniometry. Data collection will be performed by an assessor at specified intervals, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the interventions' effects over time.
Ultimately, this research aspires to contribute evidence-based insights into the relative effectiveness of Gong's and Kaltenborn's mobilization techniques, aiding clinicians in making informed decisions for optimal patient outcomes in the context of Adhesive Capsulitis.
Detailed Description:
This research is centered on the comparative effectiveness of Gongs and Kaltenborns mobilization techniques in the treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis addressing a significant void in current literature Prior studies have individually showcased the efficacy of both techniques in enhancing pain relief expanding range of motion and improving functional outcomes among patients However a direct comparative analysis between Gongs and Kaltenborns mobilization is conspicuously absent prompting this study to unveil potential distinctions in their impact on shoulder pain range of motion and functional mobility
The research design involves the random allocation of participants into two groups Group A receiving Gongs mobilization and Group B undergoing Kaltenborns mobilization This allocation will be done through a lottery method ensuring a fair and unbiased selection process The study will follow a single-blind design with the assessor remaining unaware of the treatment group assignment
Participants in both groups will also receive routine physical therapy including 15 minutes of electrical muscle stimulation with heat therapy This approach supported by existing literature aims to create a standardized baseline for assessing the additional impact of mobilization techniques The studys duration is projected to be nine months with data collection points at baseline the end of 15 weeks and the conclusion of the 3rd week
Outcome variables include pain assessment using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale evaluation of function through the Shoulder Pain Disability Index and measurement of range of motion using goniometry Data collection will be performed by an assessor at specified intervals allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the interventions effects over time
Ultimately this research aspires to contribute evidence-based insights into the relative effectiveness of Gongs and Kaltenborns mobilization techniques aiding clinicians in making informed decisions for optimal patient outcomes in the context of Adhesive Capsulitis
The research design involves the random allocation of participants into two groups Group A receiving Gongs mobilization and Group B undergoing Kaltenborns mobilization This allocation will be done through a lottery method ensuring a fair and unbiased selection process The study will follow a single-blind design with the assessor remaining unaware of the treatment group assignment
Participants in both groups will also receive routine physical therapy including 15 minutes of electrical muscle stimulation with heat therapy This approach supported by existing literature aims to create a standardized baseline for assessing the additional impact of mobilization techniques The studys duration is projected to be nine months with data collection points at baseline the end of 15 weeks and the conclusion of the 3rd week
Outcome variables include pain assessment using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale evaluation of function through the Shoulder Pain Disability Index and measurement of range of motion using goniometry Data collection will be performed by an assessor at specified intervals allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the interventions effects over time
Ultimately this research aspires to contribute evidence-based insights into the relative effectiveness of Gongs and Kaltenborns mobilization techniques aiding clinicians in making informed decisions for optimal patient outcomes in the context of Adhesive Capsulitis
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None