Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:30 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 5:11 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05292703
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-03-22
First Post:
2022-03-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Olfaction, Virtual Reality and Art in Health
Sponsor:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Olfaction, Virtual Reality and Art in Health
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
OREVAS
Brief Summary:
The main objective of this study is to compare the well-being of a group of seniors participating for a month in face-to-face sessions of artistic and olfactory activities with another group of seniors performing the same type of activity for a month but remotely with connection to a dedicated application.
Well-being, Quality of Life, Health, Apathy and Olfactory identification scales are proposed before the intervention, at the end of the intervention (V0, V1), then 3 months after the end of the intervention. A Usability Evaluation questionnaire will be sent to the participants of the remote group after use (V1).
Well-being, Quality of Life, Health, Apathy and Olfactory identification scales are proposed before the intervention, at the end of the intervention (V0, V1), then 3 months after the end of the intervention. A Usability Evaluation questionnaire will be sent to the participants of the remote group after use (V1).
Detailed Description:
Health is defined by WHO as a condition of mental, physical and social well-being. Cognitive aging markers have been defined such as apathy and deterioration of olfactory identification. Artistic creation can be used to improve health, and olfactory stimulation can improve olfactory abilities.
The main objective of this study is to compare the well-being of a group of seniors participating for a month in face-to-face sessions of artistic and olfactory activities with another group of seniors performing the same type of activity for a month but remotely with connection to a dedicated application.
Well-being, Quality of Life, Health, Apathy and Olfactory identification scales are proposed before the intervention, at the end of the intervention (V0, V1), then 3 months after the end of the intervention. A Usability Evaluation questionnaire will be sent to the participants of the remote group after use (V1).
Concerning the categorical variables, the frequencies will be calculated. First the basic characteristics (age, sex, etc.) will be described and compared for each group (i.e., intervention versus control) using parametric and non-parametric tests according to the distribution of variables. Regarding the quantitative variables, the distribution will be studied (mean, median, mode, minimum, maximum, confidence interval around the mean, standard deviation). The statistical tests used will be unpaired T-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests to compare the two appropriate groups depending on the groups.
Several effects are expected following the practice of participatory artistic workshops. First, an improvement in well-being is expected, measured by the WEMBS scale. An immediate and medium-term benefit is expected, which will be measured 3 months after the end of the workshops. In a second step, an improvement in the Quality of Life and the state of Health is expected. Measurement data for early markers of cognitive decline, Apathy and Olfactory identification should improve. In the long term and more generally, the validation of the proposed study could make it possible to legitimately ensure its dissemination on a larger scale, and to strengthen the involvement of seniors with public users in participatory artistic programs in person or remotely, in order to ensure them a quality ageing. The data will be compared a posteriori with international data in order to compare the effects of artistic workshops in person or remotely. An acceptability questionnaire will assess the adherence of seniors to a distance and virtual artistic program before and after use.
The main objective of this study is to compare the well-being of a group of seniors participating for a month in face-to-face sessions of artistic and olfactory activities with another group of seniors performing the same type of activity for a month but remotely with connection to a dedicated application.
Well-being, Quality of Life, Health, Apathy and Olfactory identification scales are proposed before the intervention, at the end of the intervention (V0, V1), then 3 months after the end of the intervention. A Usability Evaluation questionnaire will be sent to the participants of the remote group after use (V1).
Concerning the categorical variables, the frequencies will be calculated. First the basic characteristics (age, sex, etc.) will be described and compared for each group (i.e., intervention versus control) using parametric and non-parametric tests according to the distribution of variables. Regarding the quantitative variables, the distribution will be studied (mean, median, mode, minimum, maximum, confidence interval around the mean, standard deviation). The statistical tests used will be unpaired T-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests to compare the two appropriate groups depending on the groups.
Several effects are expected following the practice of participatory artistic workshops. First, an improvement in well-being is expected, measured by the WEMBS scale. An immediate and medium-term benefit is expected, which will be measured 3 months after the end of the workshops. In a second step, an improvement in the Quality of Life and the state of Health is expected. Measurement data for early markers of cognitive decline, Apathy and Olfactory identification should improve. In the long term and more generally, the validation of the proposed study could make it possible to legitimately ensure its dissemination on a larger scale, and to strengthen the involvement of seniors with public users in participatory artistic programs in person or remotely, in order to ensure them a quality ageing. The data will be compared a posteriori with international data in order to compare the effects of artistic workshops in person or remotely. An acceptability questionnaire will assess the adherence of seniors to a distance and virtual artistic program before and after use.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: