Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:25 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 9:22 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05890703
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-06-06
First Post:
2023-05-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Painless Sharp Wound Debridement With Lidocaine-23%-Tetra-caine-7% Gel Versus EMLA 5% Cream
Sponsor:
Juerg Hafner
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Painless Sharp Wound Debridement With Lidocaine-23%-Tetra-caine-7% Gel Versus EMLA 5% Cream: a Single-blind, Crossover, Randomised, Controlled Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
LIDOTETRA
Brief Summary:
In a single-blind, crossover, randomized, controlled trial with 40 participants we aim to demonstrate superior anaesthetic efficacy of lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% (IMP2) gel over EMLA 5% cream (IMP1) at comparable safety in sharp wound debridement of chronic leg ulcers.
This is a monocentric investigator initiated trial conducted in the University Hospital Zurich.
In this longitudinal trial, participants receive a sequence of different treatments (treatments on different days) and therefore are randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. One-half of participants will first receive IMP1 (first treatment visit, randomized) and then IMP2 (second treatment visit, crossover); the other half of participants the reverse sequence (first treatment visit: IMP2, second treatment visit: IMP1).
Primary Objective: We want to show that IMP 2 (lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel) is more effective in pain reduction than IMP 1 (EMLA® 5% cream) in sharp wound debridement.
This is a monocentric investigator initiated trial conducted in the University Hospital Zurich.
In this longitudinal trial, participants receive a sequence of different treatments (treatments on different days) and therefore are randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. One-half of participants will first receive IMP1 (first treatment visit, randomized) and then IMP2 (second treatment visit, crossover); the other half of participants the reverse sequence (first treatment visit: IMP2, second treatment visit: IMP1).
Primary Objective: We want to show that IMP 2 (lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel) is more effective in pain reduction than IMP 1 (EMLA® 5% cream) in sharp wound debridement.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: