Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:44 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:13 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06119139
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-11-07
First Post:
2023-10-31
Brief Title:
Anesthetic Efficacy of 18 ml Versus 36 ml of 4 Articaine Buccal Infiltration
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Cairo University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Anesthetic Efficacy of 18 ml Compared to 36 ml of Articaine Buccal Infiltration in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2023-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of the study is to compare the anesthetic efficacy and need for supplemental anesthesia of 18 ml compared to 36 ml of 4 articaine buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Detailed Description:
Patients with moderate-to-severe pain due to symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be included Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups to receive either 18 ml 4 articaine buccal infiltration or 36 ml 4 articaine buccal infiltration before single visit root canal treatments Intraoperative pain will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale NRS so that anesthetic success will be defined as no to mild intraoperative pain The need for supplemental anesthesia will also be recorded
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None