Viewing Study NCT06099938



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:40 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:11 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06099938
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2023-10-25
First Post: 2023-06-14

Brief Title: Effect of Different Labour Analgesics on Maternal and Fetal Blood Flow Observed by Doppler Ultrasonography
Sponsor: First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
Organization: First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University

Study Overview

Official Title: Effect of Different Labour Analgesics on Maternal UtA Fetal UA and MCA Blood Flow Index Observed by Doppler Ultrasonographya Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2023-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Background The purpose of this study was to see how intrathecal injections of sufentanil ropivacaine and sufentanil added to ropivacaine affected blood flow in the uterine artery umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery for combined spinal and epidural labor analgesia using color doppler ultrasound CDUs

Methods A total of 90 singleton full-term parturients who were evaluated by obstetricians for feasible vaginal delivery were collected prospectively and divided into three groups based on the randomization and double-blind principle sufentanil S ropivacaine R group each with 30 cases Main indicators include color doppler blood flow resistance indices SD of the uterine artery UtA umbilical artery UA and middle cerebral artery MCA before T0 and 30 minutes T1 60 minutes T2 90minutes T3 after analgesia Fetal heart rate FHR maternal mean arterial pressure MAP at T0 T1 T2 and T3
Detailed Description: 1 Randomization and blinding Parturients in the study were randomly assigned to Sufentanil group S and Ropivacaine group R by non-blind personnel according to the computer random number table and the allocation was hidden The solution was prepared by an unblinded anesthesiologist and packaged in a blind way and administered by another anesthesiologist The patients anesthesia providers data recorders ultrasound examiners obstetrical staff and nursing staff remained blinded to group assignment throughout the study
2 Study intervention At the time of request for labor analgesia patients were randomized to receive either sufentanil 5 μg Group S and ropivacaine 3mg Group R into the subarachnoid space All groups received the standard epidural solution that contained 01 ropivacaine with 025 μgml sufentanil Routine obstetric and anaesthetic monitoring was given after maternal entered the delivery room An experienced the anesthesiologist select L3-4 lumbar vertebra clearance to puncture with standard sterile technique using loss of resistance when the puerpera palace has expanded to about 3 cm After the puncture reached the epidural space a 25-gauge lumbar anesthesia needle was used to puncture into the subarachnoid space 2 mL of anesthetic drug as determined by her group randomization were administered into the cavity through the lumbar anesthesia needle after cerebrospinal fluid flow out A 19-gauge spring-wound catheter was threaded 4-6 cm into the epidural space All patients received a test dose of 3 ml of 15 lidocaine followed by an initial loading dose of 5 ml of the standard epidural solution Epidural catheters into vessels or subarachnoid space were excluded An analgesic pump PCEA pump 100ml containing standard epidural solution was then connected to the epidural catheter at a background continuous infusion rate of 5 mLh The visual analogue score for pain VAS was performed 15 minutes after the injection dose and if the VAS score fell below 3 the case was included in the study

An anesthesia provider assessed the adequacy of analgesia for the patients throughout the duration of labor Any breakthrough pain was managed with a physician-administered epidural bolus All obstetric analgesia procedures were performed by the same anesthesiologist to reduce errors due to technical reasons
3 Ultrasonic examination method The patients were placed in a supine position with calm breathing to perform doppler ultrasonography during the interval of contractions Ultrasound probe was placed on fetal head area Middle cerebral arteries MCA run anteriorly on both sides of the ring of cerebral arteries at the position of the double head diameter see Figure 1A We can get waveforms of MCA examined by pulsed wave doppler see Figure 1B The probe was placed at the placenta area and we can see the fetal umbilical cord connecting to the center of the placenta Umbilical artery UA could be identified by color flow and its waveforms were examined by pulsed wave doppler see Figure 1C and 1D The probe was placed at the midpoint of the groin The right and left uterine arteries UtA could be identified by color flow at the apparent crossover with the external iliac arteries and pulsed wave doppler was used to obtain waveforms see Figure 1E and 1F 3 to 10 arterial spectrograms with clear edges and no background noise at baseline were selected The above arterial blood flow indexes were measured three times and the average value was taken The SDvalue of MCAUAUtA can be measured automatically by ultrasound instrument All doppler examinations were performed by the same sonographer

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None