Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:40 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:11 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06094361
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-10-23
First Post:
2023-10-16
Brief Title:
IONTOPHORESIS vs PHONOPHORESIS for Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Sponsor:
Emre Şenocak
Organization:
Marmara University
Study Overview
Official Title:
IONTOPHORESIS vs PHONOPHORESIS WHICH IS A BEST WAY TO TREAT SUBACROMIAL IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME A RANDOMIZED STUDY
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of iontophoresis and phonophoresis applications added to conventional treatment on pain range of motion disability and functional status in the shoulder region in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome
Detailed Description:
Randomization Forty-seven patients were assessed and 43 completed the study in this randomized trial The participants were divided into two groups Iontophoresis22 and Phonophoresis21 using the online randomization software wwwrandomizerorg All patients gave written informed consent after being verbally informed about the study
Assessment Period Assessments were conducted twice at the start and after completion of the 10-session treatment program
Session Period All treatment programs were delivered five days per week for two weeks The total number of sessions was ten
Analysis The statistical analysis was performed using version 21 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSSTo verify normal distribution the Shapiro-Wilk test and histogram curves were utilized Descriptive statistics for parametric variables included mean standard deviation and percentage Since the data exhibited normal distribution independent sample T-tests were used for group comparison while paired sample T-tests were used to detect changes within the group The significance level of p005 was deemed acceptable for all analyses For variables with nominal assessments data were analyzed utilizing Yates Continuity Correction and Fishers exact chi-square test
The post hoc power of the study was calculated using Gpower 3191 software The resting VAS scores was taken as reference In this context Cohens effect size was calculated as 100 When the alpha error was accepted as 5 and effect size was 100 the post hoc power was found to be 9427
Assessment Period Assessments were conducted twice at the start and after completion of the 10-session treatment program
Session Period All treatment programs were delivered five days per week for two weeks The total number of sessions was ten
Analysis The statistical analysis was performed using version 21 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSSTo verify normal distribution the Shapiro-Wilk test and histogram curves were utilized Descriptive statistics for parametric variables included mean standard deviation and percentage Since the data exhibited normal distribution independent sample T-tests were used for group comparison while paired sample T-tests were used to detect changes within the group The significance level of p005 was deemed acceptable for all analyses For variables with nominal assessments data were analyzed utilizing Yates Continuity Correction and Fishers exact chi-square test
The post hoc power of the study was calculated using Gpower 3191 software The resting VAS scores was taken as reference In this context Cohens effect size was calculated as 100 When the alpha error was accepted as 5 and effect size was 100 the post hoc power was found to be 9427
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None