Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:37 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:10 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06075186
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-10-10
First Post:
2023-10-03
Brief Title:
Secondary Victim Awareness of Anesthesiologists
Sponsor:
Selcuk University
Organization:
Selcuk University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Assessing Anesthesiologists Secondary Victim Experience and Quality of Support Resources
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2023-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Every professional working in the medical field may encounter medical errors and patient safety issues during their careers Wu et al He coined the term second victim which was used for the first time in 2000 In a patient safety incident the patient is the first to be affected while the second to be affected are the healthcare professionals physicians assistants nurses and medical staff who are the potential causes of the incident and who are adversely affected by the consequences of this incident That is secondary victims are characterized as healthcare professionals who are involved in unexpected adverse patient events and experience occupational or psychological difficulties Almost half of healthcare professionals have been reported to experience the second victim phenomenon during their professional careers Medical errors or adverse events can deeply affect healthcare professionals and have long-term effects leading to permanent consequences In the medical field identifying the origins of errors plays a vital role in preventing future errors Second victims can encourage constructive change by not only criticizing the healthcare system but also contributing to the improvement of healthcare institutions Burlison and his team developed and validated a tool they called the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool SVEST to understand the coping process of second victims and identify necessary support resources Koca and colleagues conducted a validation study of the translation and psychometric evaluation of the SVEST T-SVEST in Turkey Our study aims to evaluate the secondary victim experience of anesthesiologists and the quality of support resources
Detailed Description:
This study will be planned between April 2023 and December 2023 at Selçuk University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Physicians who are volunteers and actively working as Anesthesiology and Reanimation Physicians will be included in the study The study will be conducted as an online survey using demographic data and the T-SVEST scale Questionnaire These consist of 3 parts demographic survey 7 items Secondary Victim Experience Awareness Survey 29 items and Secondary Victim Support Option Desirability 7 items Secondary Victim Experience Awareness Survey and 5-point Likert Scale for Secondary Victim Support Option Desirability were used The study population consists of 200 Anesthesiology and Reanimation physicians Svest scale psychological distress 4 items physical distress 4 items colleague support 4 items supervisor support 4 items organizational support 3 items non-work support 2 items and personal self-efficacy 4 items It takes into account 7 dimensions The instrument also assesses 2 outcome variables intention to change jobs 2 items and absenteeism 2 items Moreover The latter provides a seven-item section as response options for victims to report the forms of support they would like from their organizations After the survey was presented to the volunteers and the desired sample level was reached it was planned to use IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27010 program to complete the study statistics Secondary victim experiences and quality of support resources will be compared based on demographic data All items in the demographic data will be compared for psychological distress physical distress peer support supervisor support organizational support non-work support personal self-efficacy intention to change jobs and absenteeism
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None