Viewing Study NCT06030466



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:30 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:07 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06030466
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-09-21
First Post: 2023-08-24

Brief Title: Medical Students Acceptance and Learning Efficacy With Physical and Virtual Standardized Patients
Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital
Organization: National Taiwan University Hospital

Study Overview

Official Title: A Comparative Study of Medical Students Acceptance and Learning Efficacy With Physical and Virtual Standardized Patients
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study will focus on exploring the experiential differences between virtual standardized patients and physical standardized patients gathering feedback through questionnaires and brief interviews Standardized patients have been widely used in medical education and physician licensing exams in Taiwan for over 15 years With the rise of technology-enhanced medical education it is necessary to reexamine the professional attributes and identification of standardized patients and explore the implementation of virtual standardized patient systems The research aims to reshape the professional identity of standardized patients identify necessary attributes and competencies and establish a virtual standardized patient system to assess medical students acceptance and learning outcomes
Detailed Description: This research project aims to investigate the differences in acceptance and learning efficacy between physical standardized patients and virtual standardized patients among medical students Participants will be randomly assigned to either the physical standardized patient group or the virtual standardized patient group They will experience scenarios with real standardized patients or screen-based virtual standardized patients engaging in activities such as taking medical histories and explaining conditions The study will collect questionnaire feedback on learning efficacy and acceptance

The primary research questions include Are there differences in medical students perceptions of teaching scenarios involving virtual standardized patients versus physical standardized patients Are there differences in medical students self-efficacy growth after practicing teaching scenarios with virtual standardized patients versus real standardized patients Secondary research questions include What professional attributes and competencies should standardized patients possess Does technological literacy influence medical students acceptance of virtual standardized patients How do virtual and physical standardized patient scenarios differ in terms of perceptions by standardized patients and learners

This study will focus on exploring the experiential differences between virtual standardized patients and physical standardized patients gathering feedback through questionnaires and brief interviews Standardized patients have been widely used in medical education and physician licensing exams in Taiwan for over 15 years With the rise of technology-enhanced medical education it is necessary to reexamine the professional attributes and identification of standardized patients and explore the implementation of virtual standardized patient systems The research aims to reshape the professional identity of standardized patients identify necessary attributes and competencies and establish a virtual standardized patient system to assess medical students acceptance and learning outcomes

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None