Viewing Study NCT06015581



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:26 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:07 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06015581
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-08-30
First Post: 2023-08-23

Brief Title: Scaling Up Implementation Strategies to Improve the DIAGNOSE and PREVENT Pillars for Young MSM in Florida
Sponsor: Florida State University
Organization: Florida State University

Study Overview

Official Title: Scaling Up Implementation Strategies to Improve the DIAGNOSE and PREVENT Pillars for Young MSM in Florida
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: YACHT
Brief Summary: In this study investigators will test the YACHT package in 42 FDOH contracted Counseling Testing and Referral CTR agencies across Floridas seven End the HIV Epidemic EHE counties The study is powered on both effectiveness outcomes number of HIV tests of Young Sexual Minority Men - YSMM and implementation outcomes consistent with a type 2 hybrid trial It is hypothesized that YACHT will improve providers fidelity to Tailored Motivational Interviewing TMI when delivering risk reduction counseling RRC and PrEP referrals implementation outcomes and will increase testing among YSMM effectiveness outcome Investigators will use an innovative stepped wedge design to test the YACHT package including a second randomization to explore ongoing quality management QM with mystery shoppers MS as a sustainment strategy The study also contains a qualitative component based on the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment EPIS framework to further understand the context of implementation and sustainment sequential explanatory mixed methods
Detailed Description: Primary Aim To test the effect of YACHT to improve fidelity to DIAGNOSE and PREVENT EBPs in 42 FDOH contracted CTR agencies in the seven Florida EHE counties The primary effectiveness outcome is the number of HIV tests among YSMM The primary implementation outcome is developmentally and culturally responsive delivery of competent EBPs RRC PrEP referral TMI based on MS assessments

Secondary Aim 1 To assess the effect of continued QM ongoing MS feedback in sustaining the primary outcomes

Secondary Aim 2 To utilize mixed methods based on the EPIS framework to understand barriers and facilitators of successful implementation and sustainment of youth-specific EBPs within CTR to improve the DIAGNOSE and PREVENT pillars for YSMM

In the proposed study investigators will test the YACHT package in 42 FDOH contracted CTR agencies across Floridas seven EHE counties The study is powered on both effectiveness outcomes number of HIV tests of YSMM and implementation outcomes EBP fidelity consistent with a type 2 hybrid trial The investigative team hypothesizes that YACHT will improve providers fidelity to TMI when delivering RRC and PrEP referrals implementation outcomes and will increase testing among YSMM effectiveness outcome The study will use an innovative stepped wedge design to test the YACHT package including a second randomization to explore ongoing QM with MS as a sustainment strategy

Primary effectiveness outcome The primary outcome is of tests of YSMM ages 15-29 as reported in aggregate at the agency- and county-level Investigators expect that the YACHT package will improve the number of HIV tests administered to YSMM at each agency As an exploratory outcome FDOH has recently begun tracking PrEP uptake defined as 1 day of TDFFTC prescribed for PrEP Both the testing and PrEP data are currently reported in a standardized fashion to FDOH Data will be aggregated within agencies and will be requested biannually Data will be managed into quarterly windows to correspond to the data collection intervals in the stepped wedge design

Primary implementation outcomes Procedures for MS are described in C4a Exploration and domains are described in Preliminary Studies section C1c Using the pre-established MS domains investigators will compute an overall agency score using the pooled scores from the two MS conducted each quarter Pooled scores will be presented to reduce potential selection bias and confounding based on whether the same or a different provider interacted with the shoppers at either agency visit and to account for the variability across shoppers Domain sub-scores will also be created using psychometrically tested subscales for 1 LGBT visibility 2 medical form inclusivity 3 perceived clinic environment 4 privacy and confidentiality 5 relationship context 6 RRC 7 safer sex education 8 PrEP information and referral 9 perceived provider competency and 10 patient-provider interactions For ease of interpretability across domains investigators will normalize the pooled average scores into percentiles

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None