Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:26 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06001164
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2023-08-21
First Post:
2023-08-11
Brief Title:
Double-bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Sponsor:
Tampere University Hospital
Organization:
Tampere University Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Double-bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Prospective Randomized Study With 15-Year Results
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2023-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare double-bundle and single-bundle techniques for ACL reconstruction in a long-term 15-year follow-up Our hypothesis is that the DB technique is better than the SB technique
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None