Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:16 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:53 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06285903
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-28
First Post:
2024-02-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparing the Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique With Osseodensification for the Assessment of Internal Sinus Iift-ing
Sponsor:
Al-Azhar University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing the Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique With Osseodensification for the Assessment of Internal Sinus Iift-ing: (a Randomized Clinical Trial)
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RCT
Brief Summary:
Successful osseointegration considered the cornerstone in implant stability which predict the highest implants success outcomes. Implant stability depend on many factors like the implant design, surgical technique, and bone density. Posterior maxilla considered as a challenging area in implant placement, this is due to less dense trabecular bone sur-rounded by a thin layer of cortical bone which result in suffering in implant stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone density outcomes using bone densification technique and piezoelectric surgical technique in sinus lift to promote bone gain
Detailed Description:
Objectives: This study was directed to compare the outcomes of internal sinus lifting between osseodensification approach and piezoelectric surgery approach on the primary stability and osseointegration of dental implant.
Background data: Successful osseointegration considered the cornerstone in implant sta-bility which predict the highest implants success outcomes. Implant stability depend on many factors like the implant design, surgical technique, and bone density. Posterior maxilla considered as a challenging area in implant placement, this is due to less dense trabecular bone surrounded by a thin layer of cortical bone which result in suffering in implant stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone density outcomes using bone densification technique and piezoelectric surgical technique in sinus lift to promote bone gain.
Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group1: patients received dental implant using osseodensification via Densah bur, Group2: patients received dental implant using hydrodynamic piezoelectric sinus lifting. The patients in both groups underwent bone grafting under sinus membrane. Modified bleeding index and probing depth were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12months intervals. An Osstell device was used to determine implant stability by recording the values of implant stability quotient (ISQ) immediately after implant placement and after 3 months. CBCT was performed before, after 6 months and after 12 months to evaluate ridge height, bone density. Marginal bone loss was evaluated after 3 months via periapical radiograph, after 6 , 12 months via CBCT.
Background data: Successful osseointegration considered the cornerstone in implant sta-bility which predict the highest implants success outcomes. Implant stability depend on many factors like the implant design, surgical technique, and bone density. Posterior maxilla considered as a challenging area in implant placement, this is due to less dense trabecular bone surrounded by a thin layer of cortical bone which result in suffering in implant stability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone density outcomes using bone densification technique and piezoelectric surgical technique in sinus lift to promote bone gain.
Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group1: patients received dental implant using osseodensification via Densah bur, Group2: patients received dental implant using hydrodynamic piezoelectric sinus lifting. The patients in both groups underwent bone grafting under sinus membrane. Modified bleeding index and probing depth were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12months intervals. An Osstell device was used to determine implant stability by recording the values of implant stability quotient (ISQ) immediately after implant placement and after 3 months. CBCT was performed before, after 6 months and after 12 months to evaluate ridge height, bone density. Marginal bone loss was evaluated after 3 months via periapical radiograph, after 6 , 12 months via CBCT.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: