Viewing Study NCT05964686



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:19 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:04 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05964686
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2023-11-29
First Post: 2023-07-04

Brief Title: The Efficacy of Laser in Root Canal Disinfection
Sponsor: Future University in Egypt
Organization: Future University in Egypt

Study Overview

Official Title: The Efficacy of 2780 nm ErCrYSGG and 940 nm Diode Laser in Root Canal Disinfection A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2023-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The aim of this study is to assess in vivo the efficacy of ErCrYSGGdiode laser and DiodeEDTA on bacterial count in root canal treatment in an evidence-based clinical trial The null hypothesis being tested is that there is no difference in total bacterial count reduction between conventional irrigation and the two types of lasers used

Thirty patients are equally divided into 3 separate groups

Group A Conventional 25 NaOCL and 17 EDTA
Group BDual saline along with ErCrYSGG laser and diode laser combination
Group CCombined saline along with 17 EDTA and diode laser combination Microbiological analysis will be done for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using Colony forming units All data will be collected tabulated summarized and statistically analyzed
Detailed Description: The use of lasers in disinfection of the root canal has been recently implemented Lasers have bactericidal effect and have deep penetration depth inside the root canal up to 1000 um Thus it can be used effectively for disinfection of the root canal system following biomechanical instrumentation reaching areas which were considered before non-reachable

The aim of this study is to assess in vivo the efficacy of ErCrYSGGdiode laser and DiodeEDTA on root canal treatment in an evidence-based clinical trial The null hypothesis being tested is that there is no difference in total bacterial count reduction between conventional irrigation and the two types of lasers used

Thirty patients are equally divided into 3 separate groups

Group A Conventional 25 NaOCL and 17 EDTA
Group BDual saline along with ErCrYSGG laser and diode laser combination
Group CCombined saline along with 17 EDTA and diode laser combination After disinfection local anesthetic and tooth isolation and access cavity preparation the first microbial samples S1 will be collected using 3 sterile paper points and immediately placed inside sterile tubes containing transport medium of thioglycolate cleaning and shaping with final disinfection protocol will be performed according to the group in which the participant was allocated to Followed by S2 sample obturation using warm vertical compaction technique Microbiological analysis will be done for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using Colony forming units All data will be collected tabulated summarized and statistically analyzed

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None