Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:18 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:04 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05963880
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2023-07-27
First Post:
2023-05-12
Brief Title:
Concordance Between Central Blood PRessure DEvices in Nephrology Patients
Sponsor:
Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de lile de Montreal
Organization:
Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de lile de Montreal
Study Overview
Official Title:
Concordance Between Central Blood PRessure DEvices in Nephrology Patients CBP-REIN
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CBP-REIN
Brief Summary:
The most accurate way to determine intra-aortic BP is to obtain invasive measures by vascular catheterization which is not possible to perform routinely during the regular follow-up of patients However in recent years devices used to estimate central BP have been designed and approved for clinical use These devices can determine aortic BP in a non-invasive way using various techniques and algorithms and offer a high degree of precision when compared to invasive measurements of intraaortic BP On the other hand certain characteristics specific to the different devices mean that the central BP values obtained may not be interchangeable It is therefore important to determine the degree of agreement of central BP values obtained using commercially available devices
This study aims to determine the degree of agreement between central BP measurements obtained using 4 devices commonly used to measure central blood pressure ie Mobil-o-Graph NG IEM Germany WatchBP Office Microlife Taiwan Oscar 2 with SphygmoCor inside SunTech USA and BP Uscom Australia These four devices record the shape of the pulsatile wave and then derive the central BP using an algorithm The main differences between these devices lie in this algorithm or transfer function which is unique to each and the calibration used All use a brachial cuff to capture the pulse waveform and can easily be used in clinical practice
This study aims to determine the degree of agreement between central BP measurements obtained using 4 devices commonly used to measure central blood pressure ie Mobil-o-Graph NG IEM Germany WatchBP Office Microlife Taiwan Oscar 2 with SphygmoCor inside SunTech USA and BP Uscom Australia These four devices record the shape of the pulsatile wave and then derive the central BP using an algorithm The main differences between these devices lie in this algorithm or transfer function which is unique to each and the calibration used All use a brachial cuff to capture the pulse waveform and can easily be used in clinical practice
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None