Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:13 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-09 @ 1:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03935503
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-05-02
First Post:
2019-04-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR
Sponsor:
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR FOR SEXUAL, SENSORY, LIFE QUALITY AND URINARY FUNCTIONS
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
HERNIA
Brief Summary:
The superiority of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery over open surgery has been shown in many high patient-numbered studies with early return to work, less pain and good cosmetic results. The aim of this study is to determine the differences between two different methods in terms of sexual, sensory, quality of life and urinary results.
Detailed Description:
Between July 2017 and January 2018, 42 sexually active male patients were randomized with Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) method and Lichtenstein (LCH) method and repair of inguinal hernia. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 1 month and 6 months postoperatively, International Sexual Function Index (IFIF), International Prostatic Symptom Score, SF-36 Quality of Life Scale, Visual Analog Pain Scale, Beck Depression Scale, Inguinal Region Discrimination Test ( DT), DN4 Neuropathic Pain Survey, Uroflowmetry and FSH, LH, Total Testosterone levels were evaluated.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: