Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:11 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:02 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05924503
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-29
First Post:
2023-04-13
Brief Title:
BRAIN-HEART Ultrasound Study Normative Values for Transcranial Doppler Based Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment
Sponsor:
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Organization:
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Overview
Official Title:
Cerebrovascular Investigation Relative to Systemic Circulatory Parameters Using Longitudinal Assessments on Transcranial Doppler to Evaluate Mechanical Circulatory Support CIRCULATE-MCS
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
MCS
Brief Summary:
There is a dire need to establish normative values for transcranial DopplerTCD derived cerebral blood flow parameters for each type of Mechanical circulatory support MCS device and explore the relationship between the MCS devices systemic flow dynamics and TCD based cerebral flowCBF parameters TCD derived cerebral blood flow parameters can then be investigated as targets used to titrate systemic flow dynamics from MCS Having target flow rates titrated to patient specific condition using TCD may help avoid both hypoperfusion as well as the possibility of hyperemia reperfusion injury contributing to neurological morbidity We propose a multicenter study to gather normative data on TCD derived CBF and MCS systemic dynamics for a wide range of patient demographics Such data collection is only possible with multi-center collaboration given the small volume of patients with MCS patients in each center
Detailed Description:
The Mechanical circulatory support MCS devices are temporary devices that enable complete and immediate cardiopulmonary support in settings of cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock The different MCS devices differ in their operating principles and generate different systemic flow patterns pulsatile vs non- pulsatile flow volumes Peak flow rates and PI Researchers have studied different MCS devices like VA Extra Corporeal Mebrane OxygenationECMO left ventricular assist device LVAD and Impella and their effect on cerebral flow and complication profiles using various neuromonitoring techniques including TCD Most such studies were small single-center studies that added to the understanding of different flow rates and characteristics with different MCS devices but were not adequately powered or designed to establish normative values of TCD derived CBF measures in this special population There is a dire need to establish normative values for each type of MCS device and explore the relationship between the MCS devices systemic flow dynamics and TCD derived cerebral flow These normative values then can be used to assess the association of TCD derived CBF patterns with occurrence of neurological complications related to abnormal CBF in patients receiving MCS devices and advice on patient specific MCS parameters titrated using TCD derived parameters Having target flow rates in MCS patients will help avoid both hypoperfusion as well as the possibility of hyperemia reperfusion injury contributing to neurological morbidity Such data collection is only possible with multi-center collaboration given the small volume of patients with MCS patients in each center
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None