Viewing Study NCT05892016



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:05 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:00 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05892016
Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted: 2023-06-07
First Post: 2023-05-02

Brief Title: Ridge Preservation Using Different Techniques
Sponsor: Tri-Service General Hospital
Organization: Tri-Service General Hospital

Study Overview

Official Title: Soft Tissue Contour and Radiographic Evaluation of Ridge Preservation Using Different Techniques
Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date: 2023-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Soft tissue contour and radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation using different techniques

Background

Following tooth extraction the alveolar ridge undergoes an inevitable remodeling process which influences future implant therapy or prosthetic rehabilitation in the edentulous area In an attempt to attenuate the loss of hard and soft tissue after tooth loss alveolar ridge preservation ARP immediately after complete tooth extraction could minimize the need for ancillary ridge augmentation or soft tissue grafting Different techniques and barrier membranes has been proposed to achieve the sealing of extraction socket

Aim

To investigate the effect of different techniques and barrier membranes for the soft tissue contour and morphological change of alveolar ridge after ARP

Methods

The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial and recruited patients who require ARP for the purpose of implant placement or prosthodontic rehabilitation After the tooth extraction patients were randomly allocated to one of the following groups ridge preservation with a xenogeneic bone substitute and a spontaneous healing control b covered with a free palatal graft c or covered with pedical palatal graft d covered with a collagen membrane e covered with a non-resorbable high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane 2 weeks 4 weeks 12 weeks and 24 weeks following tooth extraction and ARP clinical profilometric and radiographic evaluations were performed to analyze the change of hard and soft tissue contour Moreover and the need for additional guided bone regeneration GBR or soft tissue augmentation were assessed prior implants or fixed prosthesis placement
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None